109 Board Charges Union With Scare Tactics
Demonstration planned at Shepard tonight. Board president expresses surprise at Friday’s strike vote.
Deerfield Public Schools District 109 Board President Ellen London expressed surprise Sunday at the strike vote Friday by the Deerfield Education Association (DEA) teachers’ union calling it a negotiation tactic aimed at influencing parents and the Board.
“It appears that the vote was designed to frighten parents and pressure the Board into agreeing to an unreasonable settlement,” London said in a statement on the District’s website. “We are confused and concerned that the issues do not accurately reflect the proposals presented at the negotiation table.”
In a prepared response Sunday from the union, the DEA contends it is explaining its position and not trying to influence anyone.
“Our release on Friday wasn’t given out to frighten but to explain,” the statement said. “We believed we owed that explanation to the people of Deerfield so that they would know why we took the action that we did.”
The Union has planned a demonstration at 6:15 p.m. today in front of Shepard Middle School prior to the Board’s regularly scheduled meeting, according to Union President Dennis Jensen. At the last two board meetings, nearly an hour was devoted to comments from the public about the contract negotiations.
London also charges the DEA was too quick to authorize a strike if Union leaders feel an impasse has been reached based on her view of the current status of contract talks.
“We are deeply disappointed that the Deerfield Education took a strike vote on Friday,” London said. “The vote was precipitous. Neither the Board nor the DEA has declared impasse.” Jensen said Saturday he would not rule out declaring an impasse at any time.
While the DEA news release Friday dealt with work place rules, special education and teacher evaluation as well as compensation, the Board response put more emphasis on the pay package.
According to London, the teachers want a 19 percent pay hike over three years, no change in the board paid retirement plan which could cost $100,000 per teacher and no changes in health care coverage. “In the current economic climate, it would not be fiscally responsible,” she said.
In its prepared response, the union said the last compensation offer from the board proposed an increase of two percent per year over the next three years. Jensen has said on several occasions compensation is the last hurdle to be cleared.
“We understand that this is a negotiation,” the DEA statement said likening it to a real estate transaction. “The buyer doesn’t tell the seller the most that he or she is willing to spend nor does the seller state the least that he or she is willing to take.”
Both sides remain positive a settlement satisfactory to both sides will be reached. “We are confident that if both sides act in good faith a reasonable settlement will be reached,” the Union statement said.
London agrees. “We have a long way to go but we are hopeful we can continue to make progress and reach a fair settlement that preserves the financial integrity of this school district, and enhances the ability of our teachers and administrators to work together in meeting the needs of our students,” she said.
HB
6:31 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
What? Once again this proves what we parents have been saying all along. The school board is not LISTENING! We are not frightened, Ms. London, we are ANGRY!!
Angry that you cannot come to an agreement with our teachers, angry that you are taking away services for our special needs children, and angry that your administrator compensation package is far superior than what our teachers get! I bet your meeting room this evening will be filled with angry parents, regardless of the location! Let's show them how "frightened" we are!
SBH
7:24 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
Why would she go into money when the union hasn't discussed money in three months! She is acting like everything else has been resolved! I think they are the ones that are using a scare tactic not the Union! 19% is way different than 2% for three years! This is about respecting the educators within the district....not money! Get it through your head Ms. London! The Board and Administration has taken away the respect in the district that used to be there far before Dr. Goier came on board and YOU as the president allowed it!
Mark Stein
7:30 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
The last time that money was discussed was October 11, 2011. To suggest that the parties have been held up on salary issues is a complete distortion.
AliceCameron
7:38 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
What planet does Ellen London live on?????
RC
7:44 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
"Deerfield Public Schools District 109 Board President Ellen London expressed surprise Sunday at the strike vote Friday"...
Ellen London is surprised by a strike vote after nearly a year without a contract? A competent board and administration would have used this opportunity to unveil a "strike plan" to continue our children's education in the event a strike rather than whine about being surprised. It appears that our school "leaders" are are reacting rather than anticipating and planning.
John Russillo
8:02 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
Sorry, Ellen. Too little too late. The DEA kept the public in the loop from day one. They laid out their concerns openly and honestly. The Board said nothing. Now, all of a sudden the Board is shocked?? Please. If you're going to attempt spin control you've got to do better than that.
Mark Chester
8:08 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
Without expressing any comment about a potentially bloated administration, I think that the taxpayers should make it clear that (by referendum and election) that they are not in support of any tax increases. Someone at that table has to speak for the taxpayers, who is it?
RB
8:42 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
I agree. What's manageable without tax increases? I've said it before, small increases by multiple taxing bodies add up. They compound too.
If the teachers are so unhappy with what they are getting paid and the board votes to give them raises, who pays? Taxpayers. Fiscal management is a must.
RC
8:53 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
I'm not sure who is speaking for our taxpayers - certainly not the board. I don't have any experience in the public sector. However, service-based businesses typically react to tough economic times by funneling their resources to client-facing staff and making back-office operations as lean as possible. By hiring more district administrators while simultaneously increasing class sizes, our board is doing the exact opposite. I have read plenty of studies that link child achievement to teacher-student ratios. Our board seems to believe that higher administrator-student ratios are the key.
John Russillo
8:56 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
There are two ways to get money to pay the teachers if they don't have it (and I absolutely believe they do have it). But for the sake of argument let's say they don't. There's a tax referendum which nobody wants. But how about going through the budget line by line and finding the money? Management perks have already been detailed ad nauseum as well as extra management positions created for no reason.
The district is holding a very large reserve for credit rating purposes. How big does it need to be? By all accounts the reserves have been increasing every year, meaning that the budget has an annual surplus. Stop crying poverty. The money is there to get it done WITHOUT a referendum.
John Russillo
8:30 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
Tonight's Board meeting moved to Shepard gym.
SBH
9:03 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
Again....this is not about money...please focus on the real issues! Money is usually the LAST thing negotiated!
Mara Meyer
9:12 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
It is time to alert the Board and Administration that the days of their rule are numbered. The fiscal waste in this District over the past 10 years is rampant. The educational ignorance at the top is pervasive. This Board and Administration have continually ignored the 70% of the community who no longer have students in the District by only inviting input from the enrolled families. They must honestly think the residents of this community do not care about what happens to District 109. This is evident by ignoring the families of special education students and the educational needs of these students for a very, very, long time. Divide and conquer seems to be the operative word for this Board and administration. The community must band together to make a NECESSARY CHANGE for all.
Bob Mavet
10:31 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
A vote to authorize a strike frames the current state of negotiations. So let's employ simple math and check out the scorecard. The teachers voted 261 - 2 to authorize a strike IF AN IMPASSE in negotations is reached. The Deerfield 109 School Board is comprised of 7 members. So, at best their vote could only be 7 - 0 to maintain the status quo.
Next, we should canvass the eligible voters within the District and get their opinion. A simple method would be to have people chime in on their perspective. I suggest that the concerned parents who recently organized circulate a petition for recall of board members. Use the model from the recent recall petition drive in Wisconsin that presented a strong indication of the will of the people. For illustration, the 2010 census indicates a population of 18,923. http://www.deerfield.il.us/assets/1/community_development/ExecutiveSummary-4.pdf There are 2.84 average persons per household. There are 6,586 households in Deerfield. A simple majority of 3,294 households is a nice target to achieve within the next two weeks. If you are concerned about the state of education in Deerfield Dist. 109 and wish to make a change....sign the petition. One person one vote...democracy works when people exercise their freedom of speech and their right to vote!
Simple math. A few thousand signatures trumps 7 misguided individuals!!
Start the petitions NOW!
MDG
12:45 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Clearly there are issues surrounding the negotiations, and I feel both sides are to blame. I believe there is a time and a place for public input, and I’m not convinced that we as parents and taxpayers were brought into the fold appropriately. The DEA took the lead in presenting their side of the issues, which lead to many conversations, meetings, and emails surrounding special education, bringing concerned parents to arms. At what point should the public be brought in, and what is the best way to do that? I would have preferred to hear the issues on both sides, rather than be inundated with one-sided information from the DEA. The Board maintained their position that the negotiations were private and could not divulge any information on progress, or lack of progress. While that may be true, the fact that the DEA was out in full force should have pushed the Board to take another tactic. The DEA would want us to believe it was the “big bad board” against everyone else who wants what is best for the students. Does the Board really NOT want what is best for the students?
I’ve lost my faith in both the DEA and the Board for both, together, allowing the process to fail so miserably.
Susan M
2:01 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
MDG, do you recall the results from last year's CEC study? http://www.dps109.org/Strategic%20Planning%20Documents/October%2025-27%20Site%20Review-System%20Assessment%20Executive%20Summary%20Report.pdf
Last year it was reported that there were numerous issues in the district, and this came from several different parties--not just teachers. The negotiations just brought all of these issues to the surface once again since nothing has been done based on the CEC results/recommendations.
RC
2:33 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Susan M,
Thanks for posting the link to the CEC study. It's very illuminating to parents like me who don't get to see the inner-workings of our school system. It also contains great suggestions for improvement. My favorite: "Stakeholders need to know they are listened to and have input into decisions that affect them". Hopefully, we'll see some progress on that one at tonight's board meeting.
John Russillo
2:34 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Yes, MDG, in a perfect world negotiations are carried out in private and everybody states their issues clearly and works towards a common goal. Compromises are made and everyone shakes hands and sings Kumbaya. We don't have that situation. The DEA felt they were getting nowhere with the Board and informed the public as such. The public, WHO ELECTED THE BOARD, read statements from both sides and began to weigh in. I don't feel that the teachers have "inundated" the public. I count 4 press releases from the Board and 5 from the DEA. Information from both sides is now out there. Let's see who gets the most support tonight, the DEA or the Board.
John Russillo
3:37 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
And as to your question: "Does the Board really NOT want what is best for the students?" I offer this directly from the DPS website. The Board's two stated goals are:
1) A respectful salary and benefits package that is financially responsible.
2) Encouraging and maintaining the highest quality instruction.
See which one they listed first? "Encouraging" high quality instruction? How about "ensuring" high quality instruction?
So my response to your question is that the Board is more concerned with how they are viewed by the community as a whole. They have stated in public several times that "75% of the residents of Deerfield do not have children in the District". They are focused on their fiscal objectives first and learning objectives second.
Pam
4:08 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Just for people to know, the district has had the police put up No Parking signs all around Shepard and in order to speak tonight is requiring parents to sign up on the district website beforehand.
Pam
4:15 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
http://www.dps109.org/BOE/Pages/MeetingSignIn.aspx
Pam
4:17 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
It is under "Board of Education" then "Meeting Sign-In"
Resident of Deerfield
6:29 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Pam --
The police always put up no parking signs when a large event is taking place. It makes it nicer for those of us who live in the vicinity to have access to our homes!!!
SBH
6:56 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Have they done this for past BOE meetings at Shepard? This is the first time I am hearing of a sign in before the meeting as well as police signs!
Concerned Taxpayer
8:42 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
The best thing about these stalled contract negotiations is that it is exposing many of ways that taxpayer money is being spent... that it shouldn't be... Since Dr. Goier has come to DPS109 she has been given free rein to spend money uncontrollably... She has created at least 30 new positions which were never in the district before or are necessary in the district now... Reading Coaches at every school, Math coaches at every school, differentiation coaches at every school, Spanish teachers at every school, numerous administrative positions...their secretaries even have their own assistants... She even hired a "Communications Director" to send emails and speak for her... She has "required" many of the admin staff to enroll in a doctorate program that includes a trip to Europe... of course all classes are being paid for by the taxpayers of Deerfield... some administrators are provided a vehicle... several have gas cards... The administrators continue to spend money like they are a Fortune 500 company... Since the taxpayers of Deerfield passed the tax referendum... class sizes have gone up, special services teachers have gone down, Specials teachers (Art, Music, P.E.) have been reduced... But the size of the admin staff has increased significantly... so much that they have even added onto the admin. building... Maybe the teachers would be more eager to "tighten the belt"... if they didn't see all the reckless spending going on by the administration... These are all facts!
RonnieTheLimoDriver
9:33 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Great post. Dont forget the administration building expansion to house all those new employees of the ivory tower.