Update: Superintendent Search To Ramp Up
109 Board will interview search firms at next meeting to replace retiring Superintendent Renee Goier.
(Update, 11:30 a.m.) A search for a replacement for retiring Deerfield Public Schools District 109 Superintendent Renee Goier begins in earnest at the July Board of Education meeting, according to comments made by Board President Ellen London at Monday’s meeting.
London said at the meeting search firms will be interviewed in closed session before and after the July Board of Education meeting. London promised there will be extensive community input. She hopes a replacement is selected in November or December.
Goier’s retirement request was approved by the Board as part of Monday’s meeting.
“Dr. Goier has been a leader dedicated to the students and staff of District 109,” London said before the meeting. “Thanks to her efforts, and to our excellent and hard working staff, we expect that the transition to a new superintendent will be seamless, as our focus remains directly on the students.”
Goier expects her final year to be productive and exciting. “We are facing many changes in education that effect all of us, every day, and I am excited to continue the hard work we've begun together on teacher and principal evaluations, the middle school schedule, and common core standards, to name a few of the ‘big ticket’ items on our plate,” she said in a news release.
(Earlier, 5:45 a.m.) Deerfield Public Schools District 109 Superintendent Renee Goier will retire at the end of the 2012-2013 school year, according to an agenda item in the public information packet prepared for Monday’s District 109 Board of Education meeting.
The Board was scheduled to take a roll call vote Monday to approve Goier’s request to retire. Patch will report the results of the vote and further information as soon as it is available.
To better keep up with Deerfield news follow Patch on Twitter and Facebook.
MSB
7:15 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
YES!!! Our prayers have been answered. If she wants to leave a year early, let her.
Now we have an opportunity to undo the damage this woman has done to our district and to our children.
Mara Meyer
8:53 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Probably not before the Village has to put up BIG BUCKS!
Gayle
9:05 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Fredericks AND Goier leaving!!!! I'm popping open a bottle of champagne now!
Anne
9:59 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
The mess the current administration has made with the schools in this district is outrageous; Hopefully the Board will take heed and ensure a quality replacement, to reinstill the confidence lost by the residents from the past 3 District 109 Administrations.
Steven
10:54 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Better late than never, although a few years ago would have been so much better.
barry
12:10 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Good riddance! Now lets keep the momentum going. The spin put on Caruso principal Fisher being "promoted" after being removed as principal and placed in a three day a week district position (my definition of "part time") away from direct contact on daily desicions regarding children was not a termination of employment....but, ahhh ...O.K.
Frederick's?...lets just pity the school district where she lands. Now, I do not know how, but I am confident someone will notify that school districts board, teachers, administrators and the press in that community exactly what they will have been saddled with .
johnny
7:57 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
My understanding is that Fisher will be replacing the current 3 day a week position with full time one.
MSB
11:39 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Theoretically speaking, from what I have heard, 5 days from Fisher is equivalent to about 2 to 3 days of actual work.
barry
12:25 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Most right minded people were raised with the moral turpitude to NOT pull the wings off a bug, to NOT kick a dog, to NOT allow men to jump in front of woman and children to save themselves from a sinking ship....but somehow these lessons and values were lost on GOIER and her accomplice Board President Ellen London in that you do not place children....anyone's children, at anytime, for any reason, on a back burner in order to accommodate those children qualified for advanced or excelerated programs. Sorry Girls....its way too late for you here in Deerfield now. YOU Two rang that bell, with SCHWARTZ....and here's news....you can't un ring that bell!
barry
12:40 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
hopefully, we can replace key board members, retain a couple or three of the rest and start with close to a clean slate. We need a Superintendent that will succeed for all students, with appropriate ethics and priorities, one that won't spunge off Deerfield taxpayers by having us pay for things so she/he can qualify to go somewhere else with the credentials we pay for. We need someone that will go the distance, do the right thing, and be a true and honest presence within our community. Not one that shows up in the 3rd inning and leaves in the 7th as a routine. One that is not "beholding" to ELLEN LONDON...one that works for the community and unable to give marching orders, spinning and bull to an Ellen London(school board president) and have so much control. Lets do it right this time.
Anne
12:58 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Does this mean that Dist 109 is dumping 21st Century learning that really was 18th Century?
John Russillo
1:15 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Not so fast, guys. The current Board is conducting the search for a new Superintendent. We need to make sure this Board does NOT make the final decision on the leader of our school system for the next several years. We need to work to make sure the NEXT school board makes the final decision.
Harry Steindler
1:47 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
We need to make sure the current board and the next board know what the community feels are requisites for hiring the next superintendent - significant experience in a multi-school district, experience in a community with high level parent involvement, someone who embraces and honors the education of children with special needs and understands the district's standing as the district of choice for those children and their families, someone who understands that test scores are only one aspect of a successful education, someone with a high level of respect for teachers and staff, someone who understands that collaboration with teachers, staff and the community is the only route to true success, someone with a true love for children who is willing to spend time in the classrooms helping teachers and educators to grow, someone who really understands the pulse and uniqueness of the District 109 Community.
johnny
8:00 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
We also want to make sure that the new superintendent isn't someone already working under Goier!
Harry Steindler
1:53 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
I know it's just a quote but interesting that Dr. Goier does not mention the continued improvement in services to children with special needs in her priorities for the coming year - I implore parents and teachers to not let up on the process that started last year - changes in the contract regarding these services are just one piece of the puzzle in improving these services. Until we have an administration who thinks of and speaks of special education as one of the top priorities in the district it is up to all of us to keep pounding away.
Harry Steindler
2:13 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Another area that my wife and I are beginning to focus on - improvement in the band and orchestra programs at the schools - especially the Jr. high level. Student involvement drops significantly in the upper grades - we think beyond natural attrition - no matter how strong the teachers / directors may be we need an administration that strongly supports the arts - that is an important attribute of the next superintendent.
DeerfieldResident
5:00 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
A HUGE reason for the attrition is the timing of band/orchestra. Most busy kids can't afford to give up an extra hour or 45 minutes of sleep on those days when there's band/orchestra before school. If it were somehow integrated into the school day, you'd see a lot more participation. I'd pull those kids out of their music/art/cooking/computers class once or twice a week. A far better use of time.
And, we can all hope that the insane 21st Century Skills class is gone forever. I've never seen such an ill-conceived waste of time, money and other resources.
Anne
5:52 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
not to mention the waste of money for those stupid binders that the kids couldn't use for longer then a week....I wonder who got the kickback for that?
David Greenberg
10:37 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Let me ask you all a question. Why a search for an external candidate? Why spend all the money for a search (probably a retained recruiter costing at least $60K, if not more)? Why pay relo costs? Why not just promote an internal candidate? Get what you want from someone familiar with the area and save some money...
John Russillo
6:09 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
And who would that internal candidate be?
David Greenberg
1:38 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
I posed a rhetorical question John. Perhaps you know who a suitable internal candidate would be?
John Russillo
1:54 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
No, I thought maybe you had some actual knowledge of the district.
David Greenberg
2:28 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Well, actually I do have some actual knowledge of the district. For instance, there's at least one total jerk who lives there.
John Russillo
3:50 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Haha! Nice one! And I so look forward to your ramblings on education theory concerning a district you do not live in or have any knowledge of.
David Greenberg
6:15 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
What ramblings? My comments have always been on-point and relevant. And certainly, since D109 takes STATE and Federal funds, and I'm a taxpayer to both bodies, I most certainly can have an opinion about how money is spent in that district.
I simply asked a question as to why an internal candidate wasn't sought. If that irritated you, that's certainly unfortunate, but irrelevant to the question.
Harry Steindler
11:04 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
David - I'm with you on attempting to find the new superintendent without using a search firm. I would say there are no qualified candidates within Dist 109 - but would be surprised if there are not qualified and interested candidates on the North Shore. I would suppose the district has already received feelers from candidates.
David Greenberg
2:00 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
That there are apparently no qualified candidates within D109 is truly a shame. I think it's incumbent upon any school board to ensure that there's an internal line of succession. Sure, if you're stuck, then you go outside for a candidate. But that shouldn't be the first option, it ought to be the last.
Mara Meyer
11:13 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
I think the current attitude toward education, what has happened to District 109 during the current reign, the fact the Board is HURRYING UP this decision process, no true leadership in the District, the current state of Special Education, all filter into a decision to apply for this position. It might take an out-of-state person to fill this role.
As to the qualities needed for Superintendent of District 109, it would take more than just a change at the top to change the environment. Easy for someone to pad their resume. Someone REALLY has to have experience in all areas of Admin to make the necessary changes. It will take a HUGE change of Board of Education to make an real difference. The communitty sure has its work cut out.
johnny
8:05 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
David, part of the reason there are issues with this district isn't just because of one person, Goir. Hiring any of her people wouldn't make any needed changes. Thinking back on the whole contract negotiations, I believe you were a supporter of the board /admin and their decisions, so it makes sense you would say your comment. I do agree, it is sad that no one currently would be someone I could trust.
David Greenberg
1:41 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Johnny, I was a supporter of the Board's negotiations yes. I don't know the administration in D109, and if you have had issues with the Superintendent, then certainly one wouldn't hire a subordinate who shared the same views.
My point was that retained searches cost a lot of money. For the recruiter's fee. And then for the candidate who often demands that they be given a higher salary, relocation costs, housing allowances, etc, etc, etc... Rather than spending all that money, it makes sense to me to simply groom a line of succession to choose from.
John Russillo
1:55 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
How could you support the Board if you don't know the adminstration?
David Greenberg
2:30 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
John, I can certainly read the information promulgated by the Board, review their arguments, and make my decision accordingly. Like many of us, we may not know a political candidate personally, yet we support them because of what we've read, discussed, etc.
Curious Resident
9:22 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
I find it rather interesting that all this is occurring right after contract negotiations were finished. We all know that the staff of district 109 got short changed out of retro active pay that would have been way more than the $2000 "bonus" they got especially after taxes were taken out. I truly don't believe that that person Fredericks just decided to take a new job, she had to be told at some point of time with all the complaints that her contract was not going to be renewed. As for Goier, as a resident I would have been thrilled to buy out the last year of her contract and get her out faster! There is too much to fix for her and all the others to be allowed to do more damage to our schools in another school terrm. I don't trust the board and agree that the decision for a new super should be done afterr the board elections. Clear out everything!
Anne
9:25 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Best Comment ever.....Clear out EVERYTHING....the board the adminsitration, their corrupt to the core,they have been acting in their own interests and completely forgetting that they are employees of the District to teach and educate our kids. District 109 has some great teachers and some bad ones, but for sure they have the WORST ADMINSTRATION and SCHOOL BOARD EVER
MSB
11:51 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
I do not see one positive community comment on Goier’s behalf. Sad legacy indeed. As our children would say, “EPIC FAIL”.
I agree; both the board and administration need to be gutted. Too many Board/Goier hires are left who sat back and did NOTHING while all of this transpired. They have been schooled from the Queen of Entitlements.
I hope the board has learned that pumping money into administrative perks, benefits, and hires yields absolutely no positive return on educating our children.
We have a school board which admits to only getting their (biased) information from Goier and encourages public input (on private issues) since they have made no effort to get to understand the schools, the teachers or the parents. However, during community participation they sit up there and mock us by laughing and talking to each other; playing on their computers, and “taking excessive notes” without the courtesy of looking up at the speakers. BEYOND RUDE.
Ellen London seems to be annoyed to have to listen to community input as it seems she can only hold up her head with her hand on her forehead.
I implore the board to also hop on the resignation train. Your services are no longer needed or welcomed and we don’t want you or Goier to select our next superintendent.
Gayle
12:18 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
I agree - we should wait until the new board is elected to begin the superintendent search. We don't need to hire someone by November when the job starts next July.
DeerfieldResident
1:52 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
We don't need to spend money on a search firm. Post the job, use online and old school networking tools to spread the word about the job opening, then start reviewing applications. Don't we have a head of HR? Can't that person screen down the applicants first and then have the board review them as a second layer? Assemble a team of community and district representatives (teachers, admin and board) to participate in the selection process. And...we're done! We're not trying to attract someone to the middle of nowhere for a crappy, low-paying job. This is a good job at a good salary in a great location. There will be dozens of highly qualified applicants.
And, while I'm at it, we better not be offering crazy perks and benefits to the new person. Salary, insurance, time off...done. No car, no gas allowance, no wacky continuing education commitments.
Curious Resident
2:09 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Deerfield Resident...head of HR is now Dale Fisher...old Caruso principal. I wouldn't personally trust his judgement on anything...considering that it seems the faculty within that building had a lot of complaints on the administration!
Curious Resident
2:10 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Also....it doesn't matter if they use their search agency....especially since the community and staff as seen by new principal at Caruso made absolutely no difference at all!