One Deerfield Parent’s Reactions to the Home Invasion
The emotions I have felt since hearing that two Deerfield teens were arrested for a Highland Park home invasion have ranged from fear and shock to anger and sadness.
A flood of emotions has overcome me in the last few days surrounding the arrest of two Deerfield teens for a Highland Park burglary. Operating under the assumption that the police arrested the right suspects, I also have a lot of questions; too many questions that I clearly do not and likely will not ever have the answers to.
FEAR. When I first read about the burglary, then the gun, then the apprehension of suspects, I was scared. Scared for what had occurred. The intruders who were allegedly trying to escape genuinely upset at the entire situation.
Earlier: Deerfield Teens Charged in Highland Park Burglary
SHOCK. Then, finding out that the two Deerfield teens were arrested for the burglary and that police said they entered a Highland Park home with a stolen gun, I was in complete shock. The questions bounced around in my head: Why did this happen? Why would they do this? Where did they get a gun? What led to this?
ANGER. My questions led me to start thinking through the situation even further which made me angry. What if the police had not found the gun and a child playing in the park had found it? What if instead of dropping the gun in the park the accused were carrying it with them while they ran and saw a resident jogging in the park? What would have happened then? What kind of situation could have allegedly caused these teens to make such bad decisions?
SADNESS. As I thought through those scenarios, I became sad. Sad for the victims, the neighborhood and our community. Sad that we are in a situation such as this, even though we are so fortunate that no one was physically hurt.
I became sad for the families and friends of the teens accused of this crime. I cannot imagine what they have been going through the last few days and what they have in store for them over the next few months. I do not know these families but I know the road ahead of them will not be an easy one.
Finally, I am sad for the accused teens. They are being tried as adults, but they are still kids. Kids make bad choices — we all have at one time or another. Not to the extreme being outlined in this case, but bad choices nonetheless. I am sad that these boys may have thought this was an answer to whatever issue was occurring.
LINGERING QUESTIONS. For now, there remain too many questions unanswered. And a few questions I am certain many families want to know. Will these boys be allowed back at Deerfield High School when school resumes in a few weeks? Will we find out where the gun came from and what these teens were allegedly hoping to accomplish by this act?
Time will tell.
For news about Deerfield and Highland Park in your mailbox every day, subscribe to the Patch newsletter. For more news and updates, like Highland Park and Deerfield Patch on Facebook.
Wang
6:32 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
The 2nd to last question posed in this well-written piece is: "will these boys be allowed back at school when it resumes?" Are you serious? I have only been living out here for a year but can figure this one out on my own. I got a ticket for parking on the street, in front of my house overnight...oh yeah, I'm sure the Village will totally welcome them back into the HS's general popoulation given how mellow they are known to be with "rules" around here. Maybe they will even be featured in next years DFHS Prom article that the Patch puts out. Sorry, can't stop laughing here...see you in homeroom kids (i mean adults).
tommy patterson
11:15 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
As a parent I understand the emotions by all and I really feel bad for the families. The situation has been one that has been building over the years and I can't dispute one item said about the 2 kids involved.
I think the real kicker is once you all find out where the gun was stolen from ? You will understand how bad it really is for these guys !!
RonnieTheLimoDriver
12:27 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
the plot thickens. was the gun the one used to kill jimmy hoffa?
forest barbieri
2:47 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
I think the question of will they be accepted back into DFHS is interesting, to say the least. These guys did not steal a piece of candy at the local store. They allegedly committed a serious crime with a weapon. If found guilty, I would think their classmates will be long into their careers before these "kids" get out of prison.
dad
6:08 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Innocent until proven guilty...is still the law.
Steve S.
6:09 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
For some reason, people seem to forget this.
Walter White
7:13 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
This is not a court of law, it's a court of public opinion. People seem to forget this.
Steve S.
10:22 am on Saturday, August 11, 2012
No, this is a forum of public opinion, not a court, which makes your opinion, and mine nothing more than that. And yes, in this forum these boys have been proven guilty over and over again, fortunately there is still a court of law that doesn't care what anyone's opinion in the patch is.
dad
6:11 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
If a gun were stolen from a Deerfield residence prior to the event...as a parent and resident of Deerfield...I sure would have liked to have known this.
David Greenberg
7:19 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Except that a victim of a theft is under no obligation to report said theft.
Nor should they be compelled to do so within a specific timeframe, or indeed, ever. If they choose to make a Police Report for a theft, that's their business.
But let's assume that a stolen firearm was reported. What's the difference? You still don't know WHERE it is - if you did (or anyone did) then one would assume that the Police would go arrest the thief and return the property to the rightful owner.
Moreover, making a Police Report means the information is public record, and a reasonable assumption could be that there's more firearms or other goodies 'ready for the pickin' ' in that residence - so some other criminals may find it tempting to commit more crimes against the victim. There's other possibilities too...
dad
7:35 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Agree David...I have a relationship with many kids in the area....if I heard of a stolen gun...chances are kids would brag about it if asked
dad
6:14 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
There is no surgarcoating this crime......knowing these two boys.....jail is not the answer for them....
Life is Good
8:36 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Dad: What is the answer? A mere slap on the wrist??
dad
6:52 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Big questions:
Was there really a gun?
Did the one boy really break in?
Was this a drug deal gone bad....are there drugs in this house?
There are a lot of innocent people in our jails.....you read about them all the time. there is a lot of hearsay...leave it for the trial....but I do ask of these boys...dont mess around....tell the truth and get past this!!!
No I am not saying slap the wrist....but surely get the truth of what really happned...I had an event by an ex wife.....she called the police and said I beat the crap out of her...I was taken from my home in handcuffs....I was released at the curbside.....another was I was back in my home...my ex made me dinner and sat at the table with me....got up and called the police.....she told the police she had an order of protection.....they asked her why she let me in the house and never told me I had an order against me.....
There are so many ways to abuse the law....who is to say these boys were not chased out of a house with the threat of I am going to call the police if you don’t....I am gonna tell them you have a gun!!!
If there is a crime...if they are found guilty....I am sure they will hand down the appropriate punishment/therapy/remedy
David Greenberg
7:42 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Yes, there was really a gun. The Police found it, and it was in the story.
Someone got charged with felony home invasion, so I'm willing to bet that there was enough evidence available that the States Atty. felt confident filing charges for that, so I'm willing to go with "Yep, someone really broke in".
Ellen
6:20 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
test
Ellen
6:26 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
The gun owner failed to secure the firearm. Law requires that a gun must have a functioning trigger lock that prevents firing or be kept in a safe. If a child found the gun, the gun owner is in a heap 'o' you know what.
Yes. We will find out where the gun came from.
RonnieTheLimoDriver
7:08 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Incorrect. The law is as follows (from ISP web site)
(720 ILCS 5/24-9) states "(a) Except as provided in subsection (c), it is unlawful for any person to store or leave, within premises under his or her control, a firearm if the person knows or has reason to believe that a minor under the age of 14 years who does not have a Firearm Owners Identification Card is likely to gain access to the firearm without the lawful permission of the minor's parent, guardian, or person having charge of the minor, and the minor causes death or great bodily harm with the firearm, unless the firearm is:
(1) secured by a device or mechanism, other than the firearm safety, designed to render a firearm temporarily inoperable; or
(2) placed in a securely locked box or container; or
(3) placed in some other location that a reasonable person would believe to be secure from a minor under the age of 14 years.
(b) Sentence. A person who violates this Section is guilty of a Class C misdemeanor and shall be fined not less than $1,000. A second or subsequent violation of this Section is a Class A misdemeanor.
(c) Subsection (a) does not apply:
(1) if the minor under 14 years of age gains access to a firearm and uses it in a lawful act of self-defense or defense of another; or
(2) to any firearm obtained by a minor under the age of 14 because of an unlawful entry of the premises by the minor or another person."
David Greenberg
7:11 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Current law in Illinois makes it unlawful for a person to store or leave a firearm unlocked and accessible to a minor under the age of 14 if that person knows or has reason to believe that the minor is likely to gain access to the firearm, and the minor causes death or great bodily injury with that firearm.
These thieves were over the age of 14, so this provision doesn't apply to them. Regardless, do you know the circumstances of the firearm theft? Perhaps it was locked up and the thieves unlocked it.
Blame the criminals who stole the firearm - not the victim of the theft!
The Q
7:35 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
More parents that are the problem......wake up, cut the crap.
forest barbieri
9:08 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
While I agree and have commented that the actions at this point are alleged and acknowledge that they will have their day in court where people with more information than I will pass judgment. I simply find it amazing that an armed entry into a home finds so many sympathetic, understanding and the poor confused kids’ comments. This was not some minor incident and we are most fortunate that nobody on either side was harmed. Is it because these poor misguided kids are from Deerfield and not North Chicago or Waukegan? I wonder if some alleged gang members from another suburb were in the same situation, how many people would be sympathetic, understanding and feel that alleged armed entry and robbery was just kids being kids. Confusing to me and I also wonder how many faced with armed entry into their home would immediately think, oh poor confused kid’s, maybe I can just sit them down with some cookies and milk.
dad
9:56 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Forest.....Totally agree with you. I am thinking however on a community level and keeping this within the community....we really need to step up our actions as a community to protect our kids...sending these kids to jail will do more harm than good for them....as I said I know them. BUT the actions toward them should not be sugarcoated at all.....when it comes to what shall we do with this two boy.....but do we really have to make them our poster children? I have come down very firm on my own children.....they still hold so much anger towards me....but it took them off that dangerous path.
What these boys did was horrible...unspeakable...they took risk beyond their immature minds could conceive. I also know they come from loving homes...and this "Reefer Madness" behavior is not taken lightly by their parents.
This community needs to do more....stop turning your heads away to what is happening at our local skate park...the drug deals in the Walgreens parking lots...the kids at DHS wearing the colored marks..."who's a buyer and who's a seller" of drugs...kids telling their parents they lost their meds and their stupid parents buying them more drugs to sell...stop turning your heads away from the bar mitzvah parties giving the kids :milk shots"...it’s not cool to teach your kids taking shots is ok..stop acting like drunk fools in front of your kids at these event!!!!!
This community needs to stop turning their heads in the other direction...80% of DHS kids smoked dope!
Steve S.
8:59 am on Saturday, August 11, 2012
No one is sympathetic to this crime. People such as myself get upset when the court of public opinion, which is not an official one, and one without facts, looks to destroy families. I hope, like everyone else that they get what they deserve if they are found guilty. We have the legal system for a reason and if any of the comments looking to beat down the children or parents were in the same situation or their family or friend was in this situation, I am certain they would not condone the crime or criminals but would be sympathetic to get help. And yes, if they were not white kids, no one would be defending them, that is part of the problem as well. I don't think they should be back at DHS, it's obviously not the right place for them, but I don't believe prison would solve this issue either. After all, they wouldn't be there that long and when they got out, the chances of them succeeding in life would be much less that if there were some type of rehab. That is true for the kids from North Chicago as well.
william brown
6:44 am on Friday, August 10, 2012
At some point this is more than likely that drugs are involved. I am sure the DF&HP Police are looking at this.
Where the gun came from IS important.
NRA apologists aside.
RonnieTheLimoDriver
8:24 am on Friday, August 10, 2012
I don't know if you put me in the category of NRA apologists, but I am wondering why it matters where the gun came from? Honestly, just asking. We know its stolen. Does it matter who it was stolen from?
joel steiner
1:09 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012
Why is it important who the gun was stolen from? Your last sentence broadcasts your agenda.
Curious Resident
8:05 am on Friday, August 10, 2012
I agree with everyone...I too know one of the "adults" charged with this crime and the family. I would have thought after that Homecoming tradgey we would have come together as a community with the high school and the police department and do more. While this is shocking and everyone is saying this couldn't happen here...it did. As I have stated before, this is also a mental health issue! The "adults" need additional help! We as community members, educators, parents, etc, really need to listen to conversations, look at facebook pages and TALK to the children. They always tell stuff even without meaning to. Remember the only way to stop the problem is to take action! Everyone knows that the drugs are sold at the following places, the fence by the high school in the back, the skate park by the library, and of course Walgreens parking lot. Let's start being more aware and watch for changes etc. Thanks for the opinion piece...I am sure when the trial occurs we will know where this loaded shot gun came from!
RonnieTheLimoDriver
8:22 am on Friday, August 10, 2012
If "everyone" knows where these drugs are sold, has "everyone" or anyone for that matter called the Police Dept. to report these sales? If you see this going on, CALL THE COPS. I certainly will be more aware when near these areas and do my part.
Steve S.
10:27 am on Saturday, August 11, 2012
How do you know that it was loaded, it doesn't matter whether it was or not, or where the gun was stolen from. But it has been reported that it was a rifle and not a shotgun, and there has been no report that I have seen as to whether it was loaded or not. As far as the drug deals, you are 100% correct, we all know where it happening, but it's not always that easy to catch'em. I'm confident the DF police are not looking the other way on this one.
Curious Resident
8:37 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
@ Ronnie...I know the cops have been called...I've called myself.
@ Steve S....it was in the original article stating that it was loaded
RonnieTheLimoDriver
8:49 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Good job then Curious. Keep it up. If people keep calling, the police will eventually catch the folks involved in dealing. It wouldn't hurt to take some cell phone video if you happen to witness the criminals in action.
J.S. Hoffman
10:20 am on Friday, August 10, 2012
Just read the letter, then project it on to a city parent who deals with this every day!
Walter White
10:31 am on Friday, August 10, 2012
NS Moms have alot of time on their hands.
william brown
10:23 am on Friday, August 10, 2012
Ronnie
Yes it matters where the gun came from
If it was used in other incidents
Any investigation would be incomplete if this was not found out. You see THE POLICE ARE PROFESSIONALS
not shoot from the hip amateurs
RonnieTheLimoDriver
10:58 am on Friday, August 10, 2012
Duh. Obviously the police are going to investigate where it comes from and if it was used in other crimes. That’s SOP. After it is done being used as evidence the original owner will most likely get it back. That was not my question. Why should it matter to us, the public? A number of people on here implied that somehow where the gun comes from will somehow mitigate this crime in some way. My point is, I dont care where it came from, I care that 1) it was stolen and 2) it was used to commit a crime.
joel steiner
1:13 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012
If it wasn't fired and other "incidents" there is no way to trace its presence at such hypothetical incidents. Who the other victims of these kids were might be relevant to charging them with other felonies, but I bet that isn't why you care.
Sheldon Langer
12:38 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012
You commit the crime--you serve the time. A good life lesson for these idiots.. I have a better idea. Let them serve their time in prison until their 18th birthday--then place them in the Military where they will get some badly needed discipline & structure in their suburban lives. It will do them good as they enter adulthood...
kurt swanson
7:00 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012
I am sure there may be a half dozen parents whose kids hang out with these youths that are saying "what if my child was there. it not like it was 3 a.m. but at 7am its a new day and curfew is done for the day. I learned of one today.
forest barbieri
7:44 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012
It can be a good lesson to our entitled populous. You too can be entitled to prison. Unfortunately, not as good of a prison thart you get for multimillion dollar Ponzie schemes or being a corrupt governor.
Lou
7:35 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
What's wrong with Deerfield and our country? At 7 in the morning, I was working at a bakery. The Patch is loaded with accounts of drugs swirling around Deerfield and now a loaded gun in the hands of teenagers in a stranger's house, something is amiss. Shortly after a young man massacred dozens in Colorado, this home invasion is simply another piece of the American tragedy. Bluntly, America has become on the one hand a status-achievement-wealth reality show while on the other hand, the opportunity to succeed is dwindling away. It seems that our kids will all be working for McDonalds at $7.35 per hour. Are drugs, guns, theft and crime the only way to succeed? America seems to be learning from ghetto criminals, Wall Street types and also Washington politicians who waste our money on illegal wars that benefit the defense industry. I feel very bad for all involved here, especially these kids and their parents. 6-30 Class X is a long time for 17 year olds, their parents and grand-parents. Maybe at 17 there is a chance for rehabilitation for the two and maybe our country can figure out how to provide a sane method of spreading out our great wealth so that our future is not so bleak for kids. The prosecutors hold the key to these kids's futures, charging them with a lesser crime and mandatory counseling may be the answer. Prison may keep them off the street for years, but are they hardened beyond help, I hope not.
Doesnt matter
12:01 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Who cares about this random person's opinion? Why not interview the victim? Then they can really express their sadness and shock
forest barbieri
2:30 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Not sure why you feel so bad for these "kids". Being tried as adults would indicate that these are not little kids. We have seen the recent news from Colorado and Wisconsin. The media always questions why this was not spotted sooner to avoid these senseless tragic events that negatively affect so many innocent lives.
Fortunately, they caught these guys before something tragic happened. If found guilty of armed entry, remove them from the community for whatever the law allows just as we would want for any such intrusion and violation committed by someone from outside the community.
I can only imagine the pubic outcry if these were two "kids" from N Chicago. There would be none of this, the poor kids. Will they be accepted back this Fall in HS? Perhaps they just missed a therapy session? Poor kids.
xxx
11:05 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
from what i hear in the local rumor mill, the "stolen" gun was actually provided by a "friend" of these two young men, taken from the "friends" father.
Come on HPPD finish the investigation.
joel steiner
11:41 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Again, why does it matter, for the purpose of the prosecution of these 2 thugs where they got the gun they used in their home invasion. I am sure, for other reasons the HPPD has already followed up on that, but it is immaterial to the conviction of these 2 for aggravated burglary.
Lou
11:43 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012
I guess everyone writing to this blog never made mistakes in their lives or never exceeds the speed limit or has never ever driven drunk, which threatens others just like these two did that morning. What good will prison do other than make teens more bitter, more resentful and more prone to future crimes? I'm saying, if there is hope for rehabilitation without punishment, why not go that route?
forest barbieri
12:01 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Lou:
We have laws that provide consequences for driving over the speed limit. We have laws that handle DUI's and we also have laws for committing a crime with a weapon. If convicted, they will not get a traffic ticket and pay thier $150. Nor will they get their Drivers License Suspended. Rather, you go to jail for state prescribed minimums. This is a SERIOUS CRIME not some prank.
joel steiner
2:13 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Lou,
I have, in my youth, driven drunk. I have exceeded the speed limit, even recently. However, I have never, ever, considered pointing a loaded gun at anyone or threatening anyone with a loaded gun, or considered breaking in to someone else's home, even as a joke (not funny at all).
These 2 kids got to where they are now because some how they grew up (or didn't) without any positive values or morals. It is ridiculous to compare their conduct to even serious traffic offenses. Their acts entail an element of intent not present in the traffic offenses. Living a life with a lack of consequences is probably how they came to where they are today.
How would you feel if you were the home owner who was violated and had to stare down the barrel of that rifle, not knowing if the invader was going to pull the trigger? Not so compassionate I bet.
The kids lives are ruined and that is too bad, but no one did anything to prevent them from getting to that point. Or if they did, then these kids really deserve the natural consequences of their criminal acts. These are aggravated felonies, traffic offenses are not.
dad
12:32 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Joel......outside of most of your words...I have to stop ya and tell you the parents of Josh Norris are one of the kindest, supportive and loving parents I have known.
Reefer Madness is just that.....there are no excuses for such a behavior....this is why I have expressed time and time again...this is a community issue! Get these punks out of the school yards...the skate park....the parking lot at Walgreens...parents cannot look the other way.....zero tolerance has to be enforced both at home and in our public areas. There are kids as young as Jr High...talking about drugs....they are seeing it at Jewett Park.....they are introduced to booze at the Bar and Bat Mitzvahs......as the parents are serving "Milk Shots" to the kids acting like drunk fools on the dance floor....So many of the parents here in Deerfield are even smoking dope....these kids have been exposed to way too much at an early age......fortunately...this was not Josh's problem....he fell into the culture at the high school....as I say again..."Reefer Madness"....it's out of hands at our high school and the school is doing very little about it....I had to fight time and time again with the administration...they held me off till my son graduated from there in 2009....that year several kids OD on drugs...2 died....go argue with the high school....who is taking care of your kid when they are there!!!!!
Again.....innocent until proven guilty!
Lou
7:02 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Joel, you have admitted threatening other people's lives: DUI and speeding. You never killed anyone I hope, neither have these kids. But, if you had been caught at DUI or speeding (you probably have been stopped more than once), you could have gone to jail. Odds are you did not. You got a break. At 17, I would imagine there is a good chance for rehabilitation. Why not give these three the same sentence you received and another chance.
Madukes
2:37 am on Friday, September 14, 2012
@dad, it's become way scarier than Reefer Madness. Heroin is cheap and available and being brought into our neighborhoods and schools. 100% addictive. Heroin addicts will do ANYTHING for money for the next fix. It's almost as accurate to say it's to avoid the excruciating "sick" they get if the next dose is delayed as for the mellow they get when injected.
Life is Good
6:31 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Dad: I went to DHS back in the 80's, we had the same drug issues then. We all have a choice in what we do. The high school is not a baby sitting service by any means. At then end of the day, it starts at home. We as parents are responsible for how our kids grow up. Wake up North Shore parents!
Molly
6:40 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Dad...
You point out so many of the problems in our area (and beyond). I've lived her for almost 20 years and it still amazes me that parents believe that here in the suburbs their children are insulated from that bad element. For years I've witnessed or been told of kids (by my kids) who are drinking, have drug problems - all kinds of abuse. I would agree with Lou that what these two teens did was extremely serious and should treated so but seldom does bad behavior develop because of a single effect. Most of us did stupid things as teens but burglary with a gun is not typical stupid teen behavior, it's a crime and unfortunately these two boys will face consequences that will most likely ruin the rest of their lives. By the grace of God, go I.
dad
7:09 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
But robbery with a gun has become the typical stupid teen behavior....as the drugs get stronger so does their reactions.....if your kids told you of who is doing what...you could have done what I do....I call out that kid to his parents and the police....and the school....I get the same response...yes....we know about it......this response is the same as what these boys did.....this is why I say it's a community effort....have the balls to step out and call out these kids to the proper people...the little suppot that is there could help them...
Lou
6:41 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
If there were a gold medal for stupidity, these Deerfield teens would win it easily. No one would argue, many teens are STUPID. They take dangerous drugs, drink way too much alcohol, get involved in sex way too soon and commit crime, why?, because lots of teen just CANNOT think like adults. They often cannot imagine consequences, they think they are invincible and will live forever. This "invasion" was stupid, 7:30am? their car nearby for identification? probably their fingerprints all over the place? these are not criminals, they are dumb/stupid teens, just like the ones who passed me today at around 100mph on the Edens. Should these morons be punished for the rest of their lives when they really need a big dose of grow up, something the mental health and rehabilitation community at large could provide and has provided for others? I cannot see the benefit of locking up these dummies who did the wrong teen thing one morning, with the sun shining brightly for all to see. Moreover, these blogs could serve as the impetus for the community to talk it up, especially to the kids who attend DHS and HPHS. By the way, I am not innocent of past teen crimes, and I hope my grandkids do not make the same mistakes I made and these kids made. Yes, I never used a weapon, but, at 16years old I did drive at 105 mph for no reason other than I could.
forest barbieri
8:48 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Lou :
While I appreciate your well written comments, I disagree with your thoughts on the repercussions for their actions.
"our" area already reeks of entitlement with the feelings that somehow many are "special, better and can do no wrong, there had to be some mitigating circumstances no fault of their own".
Again if these were minority kids from Waukegan, there would be outrage , private security firms hired and a hang them at dusk mentality because they are not entitled to make mistakes and we are afraid of them.
These "kids" should, if convicted, be an example to shake other misled N Shore kids into understanding that laws and minimum sentences for using a weapon in a crime should be color and neighborhood blind.
Lou
7:13 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Forest, I also appreciate reading your comments and would hope both you and I can imagine the future with these two either driving around in a car again or walking the streets near our homes. What would be better for them and our families: the guilty ones subjected to intensive and evidence based rehabilitative counseling OR imprisoned in a windowless 8x10 concrete walled prison cell for years? My own rehabiltiation came from a compassionate and intelligent cop who stopped me at 3am and drove me home to have a discussion with me and my mother. He could have driven me to jail to spend all day with drunk men and others. I luckily made it through the teen years without a scratch and obviously you did also. Frankly, none of us are without guilt. If we think back, others looked out for our well being, that cop could have easily indoctrinated me into the criminal justice system and I would not have benefitted as much as that impromptu meeting between my mom, the cop and me. And thinking about using punishment to teach other teens, I don't accept that argument. Because teens believe they are invincible (can't be rational), threats of prison don't work. As far as color coded justice, you may be correct. But since the common denominator for most young criminals is poverty, why couldn't our society equalize the money field, it may result in less crime and make for a better world.
David Greenberg
12:58 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
In these threads we've heard that these young men have a very checkered past - other thefts, robberies, fighting, etc. So they're not "rehab counseling" candidates who have screwed up the first time.
They committed three felonies - Class X, Class 1, Class 2. They stole a firearm and broke into another home with the firearm. I'm gonna go with the windowless 8x10 concrete walled prison cell for 6-10 years.
Someone I think that if you'd run over someone, hit something with your car, etc. that the cop wouldn't have brought you home rather than to jail - although, in some cases, a night in jail could be easier than dealing with mom :-)
As for the "common denominator" being poverty. I agree - but I'm 100% against "equalizing" the money field. If you want something - work for it and buy it. As welfare and other entitlement programs have proven - giving something to someone who didn't work for it leads to more entitlement issues.
We've funded all manner of programs designed to help people help themselves. But because we never wean them off the public teat, there's no incentive to actually help themselves. I'd set hard limits for public assistance, and require milestones to be hit. No BS'ing, no wiggle room, no excuses. Do it and you get help for a certain period of time. Don't do it, and you're on your own. Harsh? Yes. But certainly necessary if we ever hope to get out of this entitlement hole.
joel steiner
1:45 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
I must agree with David G. I am really appalled by the comments that equate these 3 felonies with traffic offenses. Not even close! Drunk driving is illegal only because the legislature says so. Armed robbery has always been illegal. There was a level of thought and planning involved (even if bad planning) that marks the difference in these acts.
Perhaps if there had been hard consequences for the prior bad acts these 2 boys were guilty of, the current events would not have occurred. In any event, if proven guilty of these serious crimes, prison is appropriate. It is too bad that these lives are ruined/wasted. However, if past performance is any guide, to let these boys off now will not result in a saving turn around in their behavior. Rather, it will only reinforce the belief that they can do as they please without consequences. Next time they will kill someone and the same nonsense about their wonderful parents, etc. will be forth coming. Armed home invaders deserve to go to prison, no matter what.
Lou
6:40 am on Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Joel, traffic offenses lead to deaths and injuries daily in America. And they often are a chosen behavior such as speeding, drunk and drugged driving. These stupid kids also allegedly made a stupid decision to enter and use a weapon. But no one pulled a trigger and no one got hurt, just like the last time many of us exceeded the speed limit, ran a stop sign or drove after drinking enough to make us groggy. We made stupid decisions also, but we do not believe we would spend time in jail, am I correct? Stupidity is all around us and within us, but the good thing is, sometimes it makes us smarter later.
David Greenberg
12:37 pm on Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Lou - if you were going 40+ mph over the limit, yoou'd likely be going to jail under today's statutes. If you were speeding 30+mph and caused or were directly involved in an accident, you'd probably go to jail. If someone died, you'd go to jail. If you went thru a stop sign and someone died, you'd go to jail. If someone drove intoxicated (over the limit), then they're going to jail.
If the speeding wasn't too much (< 40MPH over), they'll get a ticket if no accident or other circumstances existed to warrant jail. If someone went thru a stop sign and didn't cause an accident/death, sure - you get a ticket and don't go to jail. If you drive a little intoxicated and you're under the limit - you don't go to jail.
But in the case of a home invasion - the law considers it such a heinous event that there's no wiggle room for the Judge - minimum 6 yrs, max 30 yrs. Add in a firearm - and the sentence is rightly enhanced because the victim(s) don't know if the firearm is loaded or not. A shot might not be fired from an unloaded firearm, but the victim(s) could have a heart attack, fall and die while attempting to flee, etc., etc.
This wasn't "oops, went thru a stop sign while speeding and no one got hurt so no foul" stupid - this was "hey, let's steal a shotgun, then go rob a house with it" stupid - and they are two completely different animals. One gets a ticket, maybe traffic school. One goes to jail, and goes to Criminal U for 6-12 yrs instead of U of I.
dad
4:01 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
All hearsay....it's easy to see this is a drug deal gone bad.....the house that ONE of the boys was in; was selling drugs....this will all come out in trial...but to say these boys have a checkered past.....hahahahaha....no claims have been made to this on any police public blotter or school public record.....hearsay again....the boys do not have any such police record or have been found guilty of any such crimes as you mentioned Joel S.....my money is on a light verdict...my best guess was a “Big FU....get out of my house or I will call the police” was said....my best guess Jake L.....screwed over one of these boys....my best guess is an unloaded gun was taken to intimidate...my best guess is.....Jake is in a whole lotta trouble for selling dope...Joe M is in trouble for being in a residence he was not invited into....and Josh N is home free on any serious charges.
I chalk this up to a media frenzy on the Deerfield Patch of a half assed story....early to jump the gun on a story......all media parties guilty of never having children of their own and not thinking of what this all sounds like from a parents perspective.....you all sound very foolish on sending 17 year old boys to jail on a blown out story in Pleasantville USA.
David Greenberg
5:53 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
"no claims have been made to this on any police public blotter or school public record....." - nor would there be if they were charged as Juveniles by the Police, nor would there be any "school public record" due to Federal student privacy laws.
As for an "unloaded gun to intimidate" - that doesn't matter. The victim it's pointed at doesn't know if it's loaded or unloaded.
And for the record - I do have kids of my own.
forest barbieri
4:21 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
While it is true that all of the facts are not on the table and indeed all parties are innocent until proven guilty, the Police Reports indicated an unauthorized home invasion that likely included a weapon. Now if the weapon was intended to scare someone, no doubt it would. So much so, that if there was access to another gun, someone could have been seriously harmed and the alternative of prison might have been a much better option than other potential consequences.
This cannot be taken lightly as an everyday occurances or just kids being kids. So, we will all have to wait and see what transpires with the investigation and trial. If anyone is innocent then that person(s) should indeed walk free and have this put behind them without predudice. If however, where there is smoke there is fire and indeed an armed entry was committed for any reason, by anyone....then there are serious consequences that cannot be simply and blindly ignored.
I also think this is two seperate cases, one involving the entry regardless of the reason and one for possession and possible dealing.
dad
5:04 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Forest....TOTALLY AGREE! What was done was so stupid by all 3 youths! These Scarface like actions will be handled by the law. It's a shame what has happened to our community...these families for for these 3 brats to have done such a heinous crime to one another's lives. Josh was a champion goalie at DHS and was a decent student....I don't know the other 2 involved as well as I know him; but my children said this was eventually gonna happen to these boys. It's a shame because Josh has some of the nicest loving parents...I totally agree that many times we are not firm enough on our children...I was and even though I physically knocked my son of this dangerous path...he is still angy with me today for my response to dope...school and his life....these kids do not understand the meaning of Reefer Madness...I see it everyday...I know the fear some parents may have to challenge their kids....the fear of suicide, cutting, kids really gone mad with guns.....etc...etc...etc. I really do not believe thse boys had it in them to go into a house and try and rob it....I questioned right away about this...the kids I know all told me that was a drug house...it was easy to put 2 and 2 together and figure out what really happened....right now this is a he said...and he said situation....the papers made it sound so random at first..I even doubt it was a surpirse to the parents that this boy was in the house...I think mommy or daddy walked in on a drug deal and got pissed off!!!
David Greenberg
5:59 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
The meaning of "Reefer Madness" is entirely that of propaganda intended to convince people that blacks smoking pot (reefer) would go insane and attack white women and is so far from the truth that it's comical. The whole reason for the propaganda campaign was to protect commercial wood pulp and cotton interests from hemp because hemp can be used to make paper, and clothing which is more durable than cotton.
Now that said, persons under 18 shouldn't be smoking pot, drinking, or indeed using any drugs other than those prescribed for them. HOWEVER, it does and will happen and we have to deal with it by telling them the truth about the consequences of their actions. And not some BS "Reefer Madness" or "Genetic Mutation!" that kids see right through, but rather what the consequences of impaired judgment can be - in relationships, operating machinery, driving, etc.
STOPTHEBASHING
3:12 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
WHY? are all you PATHETIC people leaving comments. Concerned citizens? PLEASE. Nobody in HP or DF have exciting life. HP and DF is the mecca of drama and opinions. I am the closes person leaving a comment on this situation and if circumstance were different. I would have been in that home the morning of the robbery. To the teens who rob that home..YOUR LUCKY I WASNT THERE THAT MORNING, CAUSE IF I WAS, I WOULD HAVE ATTACK YOU AND GOTTEN YOUR GUN, HOG TIED YOU AND THEM CALLED THE COPS. or I would have gotten shot and YOU PATHETIC teens would have been up on murder or attempt murder charges. Believe me the people reading this comment. If you can figure out who this is. Know that I wouldn't back down from two pathetic teens with guns. I have to much PRIDE for that. I would rather be shot. Plus then the pathetic DF teens, would be big bubbas, GF in prison for at least 15-20 years.
forest barbieri
9:17 am on Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Lou:
Re your comments: "These stupid kids also allegedly made a stupid decision to enter and use a weapon. But no one pulled a trigger and no one got hurt"
Really? So that makes it a minor, little slap on the wrist, oh you goofy guys thing? Next time someone enters your home with a weapon be sure to high five them.
dad
7:41 pm on Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Did they really break in? Did they really have a loaded gun? What did Josh do? What did Joe do? All we know for sure is that Jake had dope and money in a safe and was a known drug dealer....these are the only facts of this case beacuse the police caught him red handed....but the words thrown at Joe and Josh are all hearsay.....did anyone stop and think....did Jake screw Joe anbd Josh out of money and the boys were going there to pick up their money or dope....and possibly Josh called the police.....are there really moms and dads home at 7:30 anymore...I am not...I am on the train heading downtown for work each day....what is Jake told Joe...get out of my house or I will call the poilce????....Again....the only real fact of this case was Jake had dope and cash in a safe in his bedroom.....the rest is media hype!!!! So far I see the states attorney threw a bunch of nonsense claims at these boys all built on hearsay.....
David Greenberg
8:01 pm on Tuesday, August 28, 2012
"did Jake screw Joe anbd Josh out of money and the boys were going there to pick up their money or dope" - who cares why they went there. All that matters is that they went there without permission, and brought a gun with. So instead of showing up, knocking on the door and trying to figure out what's arguably a business transaction (albeit an illegal one), they turned it into felony home invasion with a firearm.
There were at least three ways to handle this besides what they did:
1) Forget the whole thing. Engage in an illegal transaction, so don't be surprised when the other party doesn't hold up their end of the bargain and rips you off. From what I understand, there's no insurance either (well, not on the traditional market, I don't know about the black market - but even if there were, that's a whole other risk).
2) Call your parents - hey Mom, so-and-so promised to sell me an "ummm, Xbox" and then didn't! He took the money and didn't give me the game... Yeah, that's it, that's the ticket!
3) File a civil suit in small claims court. Sure, it'd be comical. Sure it'd likely get thrown out. Sure, the morons would probably get arrested for suing over a drug deal, but hey - it might be something in the misdemeanor range, instead of, oh, I don't know - a Class X felony with mandatory minimums?
Just about anything but breaking into a house, and using a firearm is better than what the young men came up with in this case.
forest barbieri
7:55 pm on Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Where is Perry Mason or MacGyver when we need them?
David Greenberg
8:12 pm on Tuesday, August 28, 2012
MacGyver would have brought a potato gun, which despite the name, isn't considered a firearm by ATF, so he'd have probably skated on the firearm charge, but gotten busted on the home invasion thing - well, unless his pal Pete could get him out of the jam...
Perry Mason would have gotten into an argument with Ironsides, and then called up Kojak to investigate. In the meantime, because it's Highland Park, Andy Griffith would have moseyed on up, talked with everyone, thrown Otis in jail for a night when he was floating around trying to steal the alcohol/weed the kids were dealing, and turned everyone's life's around before heading on over to Aunt Bee's for some apple pie... mmmmm... pie...
(uggh, I'm showing my age, aren't I?)
joel steiner
9:43 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Lou,
I have not admitted to any of the acts that you attribute to me. Time to stop personally attacking someone you disagree with. That is usually the first sign of the lack of merit to someone's argument, that and you're hiding without disclosing your whole name.
1. In the 60's the traffic violations did not carry the same moral approbation they do today. That's why drunk driving and highway deaths have steadily decreased.
2. Even in the 60's (and always for that matter) braking into someone's house, especially with a weapon (knife, club, sword or gun) was always a serious crime (in earlier times a capital offense.
3. Even as a teenager I appreciated the extreme difference between driving offenses and home invasion, with or w/o a deadly weapon (stolen weapon).
There is something seriously wrong with your moral compass if you truly believe that the behavior of these teens is the equivalent of nothing more than major traffic offenses. How dare you equate my teenage indiscretions with the crimes of these boys. My parents raised better than that.
Apologists like you are the reason that the lack of early consequences lead to more serious criminal acts like these 2 are alleged to have committed.
Lou
9:43 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012
"I have, in my youth, driven drunk. I have exceeded the speed limit, even recently". Joel, these are your words, not mine. I am not equating home invasion to traffic law violations, however, both can and do result in death. I'm sure if you were stopped by the police, you would not want to go to jail for speeding, but you could under Illinois Law. You would want a deal. These 17 year olds do not have the neuronal capacity to imagine and appreciate the consequences of their acts, they deserve a deal also for their alleged first time non death causing felony. Prison will nothing for them except make them angry and vengeance prone. Better, society needs to use methods that will move to prevent future crimes not ones that make our society more dangerous.
Queen 8
3:24 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012
These so called kids need to have consequences for their actions, because thanks to easy punishments their crimes become bigger like Carly Rousso killing Jaquelin Santos In Hp.
Molly
7:44 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012
Queen 8, what consequences do you have in mind that would eradicate any future problems? When does this start? At what severity? I am not excusing any law breaker or misbehavior, but I have witnessed parents who have tried just about everything and bad things still happen. My own child has brought home friends that judging by their appearance I would have forbidden her from associating with, only to find out the clean cut, athletic AP student is the one who parties every weekend. Keep an open mind and try to help those parents and kids who need help, sometimes it's just a non-parent that the kid can talk to (who doesn't let them get away with stuff but will accept their good side). I would think that the boys involved in the break-in and the teen driver will all face stiff penalties, certainly jail time.
HP Mom
7:50 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012
I agree. What is going on in HP & DF with these 17 & 18 year olds??? Parents: get more involved! Read your kids' Twitter & Facebook pages. Know their friends. TALK TO THEM!
David Greenberg
1:29 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012
I'd hazard a guess that what's going on with 17 & 18 yr olds is what's always gone on for as long as we can remember. Old kids/young adults starting out on the path to adulthood who think they know it all, don't realize they don't know it all, and who make mistakes that they sometimes look back on as adults and say "Wow, we were such idiots. I can't believe we did that."
Now that said, there's mistakes (such as buying a car that looked great but ran like a tank) which you survive, and there's mistakes (such as the most recent stories we've been talking about) that impact one's lives for a very long time, possibly forever.
You can try to be involved, you can try to read their Twitter and Facebook pages. You can try to talk to their friends. But you have to realize that talking relies on trust. And if your kids are lying to you and doing a good job of concealing the truth on their Twitter/FB pages, you may not know what's actually going on.
That's why I believe it's important to tell your kids the truth about life when they're 15, 16, 17, 18. If you did some crazy stuff - discuss it with your kids. Own up to it - explain how you've thought about it over the years and why it was wrong, and what could have happened. Talk to them about consequences - stuff you get away with as a kid, and how it's handled as an adult.
But also realize that no matter how much you say, or try to do, they may just have to experience somethings for themselves before it sinks in.
Molly
8:07 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012
The talk needs to start at age 8! There are so many parents I run across who can't believe that there could be drugs, alcohol, cutting, stealing, sex, etc. in a great place like HP or DF. Hello??? Where did these parents grow up themselves to be this naive?
Curious Resident
8:22 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012
I was wondering if anyone would comment between these 17 year old adults and the 18 year old adult that KILLED a 5 year old girl and injured the rest of the family! Some people in articles regarding her have posted past tweets from her twitter account and have noted that this is not her first time in trouble! What is going on here?!?! Are we as community members missing something or are we turning our backs turning a blind eye and ignoring the signs!?!? All these "adults" have had to be screaming in some way for help! Apparently, to me the teachers in the community are not abt enough to recognize problems, and as community members we truly are missing stuff too! Once again...I am sure there is more to both situations...the "adult" boys go to court tomorrow, hopefully we will learn more and learn from what happened...as for the "adult" girl, I seriously hope that her charges are raised, because killing someone while intoxicated is far more severe than the charges against her. She too needs some major help and because it is a well known family in the community, she should not get off easier! Keep talking and keep listening....they are in high school but they talk even when they think we are not listening!
Molly
11:32 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012
In my experience both personally and from observing others there are people who turn a blind eye by ignoring or shunning those who are thought to be "bad kids" with the hope that if they forbid their kids from seeing these bad kids their kids will be fine. Then there are those who tell the " bad" parents to do this or that and the problem is solved (never so easy as that). And in regards to our local teachers I think that the majority have a pretty good read on our kids but it's pretty tricky for teachers to tell some parents that something is not right. No easy answers unfortunately.
Take the High Road Please
11:26 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012
I will comment on the 18 year old kid who killed the 5 year old. She is a sweet kid that sadly made bad choices. We do not know at this juncture what the intoxicating substance is and in fact could be meds prescribed by a doctor. I would ask the community realize that one is innocent until proven guilty. As for the parents of these children, I am positive in Carly's case she has good parents. I know both of them and they have tried to help Carly. One has to realize that a child sometimes has a bend that no matter what "morale" training you give them will gravitate to the wrong things. I think as long as it is OPK (Other people's kids) all of you are so quick to judge - what if it was YOUR kid? then what? Only you as a parent of each child mentioned above knows the situation and can judge. The rest of you need to take a chill pill and let the authorities deal with the situation.
Molly
1:06 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012
I would agree 100 percent with Take The High Road...I hope none of my comments made you think I was judging any of the kids or parents involved. As in many situations we, the public, will not be told every detail (nor do we need to be) of what has happened. We should allow the families & authorities work through this w/o our interference but I will use this as I reminder to talk to my kids & their friends as much as possible.
David Greenberg
1:20 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012
I too agree with Take the High Road. However, I disagree with Molly in some regard - where she says that "We, the public, will not be told every detail (nor do we need to be) of what has happened.", short of a present-day classified operation involving National Security (where we get the info 50 yrs later), yes - we do need to be told all of the details.
And it's not to be 'nosy', but rather to do our job as the Public is the one to "Watch the Watchers." How can you know that the accused is getting a fair trial without the details? How can you know that the victim is likewise having their rights protected without the details? How can you know that your tax dollars are being properly spent w/o the details?
As has been said, sunlight is the best disinfectant - and in this case, sunlight is the details.
Molly
8:06 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012
David...I was thinking of the personal details of what any family may or may not have done over the past 18 years, not the legal process.
Benny G.
3:30 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012
There is only one guaranty in all this ridiculous nonsense: This incident has been blown WAY out of proportion as it relates to what happened and the motive of these young white suburban criminals.... LMAO... What a colossal joke this all is.
Carry on with it---