Points to Ponder About District 113

Thoughts about the community in light of the high school board's community meetings.

Our community is comprised of individuals who differ on many issues. We stand united in our desire for safety, excellent education for our children, and the numerous attributes of our neighborhoods.

As homeowners, we realize the high taxes we pay for the above. We also realize that we want, and expect quality for those dollars. We are stakeholders.

I recently attended the sponsored by the Board of Education regarding capital expenditures for our two high schools. There are costly improvements that must be done.

I am in favor of spending money on our schools, but have reservations on how this money is spent.

It seems apparent that routine maintenance - for whatever reason - has been woefully neglected.  When we see for ourselves or are informed about stair treads in heavy traffic areas, either missing or in disrepair; when banisters and stair railings are loose and insecure; when toilets do not function for long periods of time; no excuses are acceptable.

For a district that has over 35% of our budget in reserves (approximately $35 million), a dual question looms. Who are the individuals deemed responsible for the buildings, and what are their qualifications? Why haven't the buildings been maintained over the years?

We have two schools, representing less than 3800 students, with an operating budget of over $90 million. This exceeds the operating budget of the ENTIRE City of Highland Park, with 30,000 residents. The City's budget is responsible for all streets, sewers, snow removal, police departments, fire departments, and a multitude of other services. Something is wrong with this picture.

The consensus of well-respected and documented demographic studies project a DECLINE of 15%-20% in student enrollment over the next 10-15 years.  This fact must be acknowledged and incorporated into any "Master Plan."  Why do the "powers that be" seemingly ignore the credibility of this data?

Last year, after a failed referendum, many people stayed closely involved in the next steps for the schools, because we care. To date, over $300,000 of taxpayer money has been spent on a combination of failed plans, PR firms, market research groups, and hiring new firms. All of this money designed to make a new plan.

The same Board of Education that pushed for the referendum now takes the position that we should forget about the first price tag of $133 million, which was said to be absolutely necessary:  Let’s try again.

The District-sponsored market research committee found that the community at large had credibility issues with what the Board of Education was saying. A community-wide survey was issued to all households, and there were even hard copies available at libraries. As citizens, we were given a recap of what the community said, but were never given access to the data from the responses. The Board provided several various excuses for not disclosing the raw data, including that the general public was not educated enough to understand it, all the way to finger-pointing over who actually had the data.

The Board of Education missed a good opportunity to restore their tarnished reputation. Sadly, now it is too late. Any creditability factor has vanished, even if the data still exists.

We all have heard numerous times about the 100 or so people who served on the committees, all their hours invested, and their findings. On paper, all of this sounds great, but when looking past the statements, the working groups were heavily weighted by Board of Education members, paid employees, vendors who work for the District, and then finally some well-intentioned community members. The deck was stacked from the start.

An oversight committee, which became a steering committee, and then became a cheering committee, was supposed to sort through all the input.

Within the past month, parents and guardians of Highland Park High School students received a letter notifying them that they had the option to transfer students to Deerfield High School due to No Child Left Behind. HPHS has failed to make Adequate Yearly Progress for FIVE years, and is being forced to plan a school restructuring as a result. In the SIXTH year, the restructuring must be implemented.

Why wasn't this important piece of information given to the community at large when it affects our schools? Where is the transparency here? The public relations department at District 113 has certainly been active publicizing the study groups and presentations. The lack of disclosure on NCLB casts doubt on what the Board of Education is sending out.

We pay tremendous salaries to those in charge ….. some of the highest in the country, and deserve the top notch service our high property taxes reflect. Yet last Tuesday evening, at the community presentation from Perkins + Will, the new architectural firm, hired for $120,000, our expectations were again let down.

At this presentation, paid for by us the taxpayers, and sponsored by the Board of Education, no one expected that forms would be handed out for questions or that two people, volunteers from the Leadership committee would glance at the questions and statements in a five-minute break, and then, at their discretion, decide what to read and answer giving their own views. WHERE were the decision makers, and why weren't they answering the hard questions?  This Board would NOT answer our questions.  It was an insult to the community. 

The germane issue here is that we the taxpayers will likely again be asked to pay for a multi-million dollar referendum, and the Board of Education has not yet given us answers.

If 113 wants the support of this community, they need to be more forthright, and answer questions directly. Accountability and transparency are powerful words, concepts that must have meaning, and held true to their definition. The members of this Board of Education asked for the stewardship of our schools. One-third of our tax bills go to these schools, we must have a voice, along with the elected officials, as to where that money is spent going forward.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Just Sayin September 21, 2012 at 02:22 AM
Jesse L. ... The fact of the matter is that it IS tolerated here. Your comments have a rather self righteous tone themselves ...therefore you are a part of the group you choose to scold. " Knock it off now"...you sound like an impatient parent or an aggrevated teacher.
Jesse L September 21, 2012 at 03:22 AM
just sayin..you are right. It is tolerated here, but we (and yes, I include myself here) need to stop thinking this is ok. I do sound like an angry parent/teacher, but I think it's wrong that we get so nasty when we disagree. don't you think it's a terrible message to our kids...ideas? Perhaps its the anonomity here but the messages are so nasty. You said it is tolerated here. Do you think it's ok?
Bringin' Down Briarwood September 21, 2012 at 02:49 PM
I hope you'll also consider the poor example set for the kids with the clear lies and obvious misleading statements of many. If I were to use this as an example with my kid, I would tell her the harmless name calling can be ignored. It's cheap, but in the end ... eh. People will always have different styles, and especially in the Internet age, it's something she will need to grow accustom to. However, the flat-out lies to sway large groups of people and the inability to follow up on promises would be far more concerning to me with her. On the other hand, there's also a great example for her on how sooooooo many people with so many ideas volunteered their time and came together for a great cause.
Jack Straw September 21, 2012 at 03:40 PM
This is the one of the best strings so far on this subject; this seems to be a good cross section of the opinions shared throughout the community. I know people that won’t vote yes no matter what is said, and I know the same amount that will vote yes on any school related referendum. It is nice to see David building some Consensus on this, now if you could stop being an expert on everything that would help your cause. What the pro builds should remember we are an ageing in place city with housing costs that exceed a first time buyers ability’s to meet. Additionally tax payers in general are fatigued and are struggling to meet the current tax bills. So your technical may be on solid ground your fundamentals are still week.
Just Sayin September 21, 2012 at 04:44 PM
Jesse L ... Personally I do not communicate with my friends, loved ones, business relationships or even strangers on the streets in a nasty or negative manner. My children have learned to communicate in a respectful manner by my example. I will in all honesty admit that I have vented a time or ten in formats such as this. We humans have the luxury of a wide range of emotions and communication styles. I do not stand in judgement of how or why people choose to express themselves in any given moment. I do think that in general people take themselves and their opinions too seriously. Life is too fleeting dwell in negativity and one would best maintain an open mind and heart. So...to answer your question, do I think it is ok...my answer would be yes. Humans will be humans...in all their beauty and ugliness. I would rather people vent their frustrations here than on the people close to them...or in road rage...or physical confrontations where someone might get hurt. One has only one person to look at in the mirror...and that is oneself.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »