.
Feedback

The Strawman Returns

If the economy were a horse race, would we stay the course? It would be folly to expect that horse to win, place or show, and disastrous for this nation.

"The Strawman Returns" is a companion piece to the "Strawman Speaks," published on Friday, Oct. 5 2012.

By Nancy Thorner and Ed Ingold

As expected President Obama is back in stride, angry and animated, continuing to attack the strawman, Mitt Romney, for things he never said. Obama's morning speech at George Mason University (Virginia) on Friday, October 5th says it all. At least Clint Eastwood had the courtesy to provide a chair for the person in absentia!

In the President, we see a man who cannot stand up to anyone who challenges him, and won't even tolerate it from people who should be advising him, rather than cowering in the corner. We've all known men who would talk big in front of their supporters (or subjects), then flee from confrontation. It's called "Leading from behind." Real leaders don't crow about what they are going to do, they just get things done. They inspire their followers by leading the charge.

We know that Mitt Romney rescued the 2002 Winter Olympics from ruin, a cesspool of corruption and accusations of bribery. Typical of Governor Romney, he did not repeat these accusations made either before or after he made that event a success. He made it work without playing the "blame game."  http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jan/06/mitt-romney/how-important-was-romney-fixing-troubled-salt-lake/

Mitt Romney used the same principles of leadership to rescue hundreds of companies, save thousands of jobs, through the investments and governance of Bain Capital. Did some fail? You bet! Companies like Bain Capital are like doctors - they only treat the sick patients, and not all get well. In Bain's case, 80% of their "patients" did get well, and those that didn't survived years longer than expected. Medical doctors should do as well.    .http://www.redstate.com/conservativekaren/2012/06/24/attacks-on-capitalism-fall-flat/
 
Contrast Mitt Romney, as a former governor of Massachusetts and one who turned many companies around to make them financial successes, with a man who never ran a business or headed a state, but who served as a unimpressive IL state senator before his short stint as a U.S. senator from Illinois before becoming president..

We're going to continue to hear a lot about the drop in unemployment from 8.1% to 7.8% in the most recent tally. (http://www.bls.gov/cps/). It looks good for the President, even though 7.8% is still pretty grim.

Unfortunately, the tally system is almost meaningless.  It does not deal well with an economic system which is turned upside down and inside out. Furthermore, the "corrected" September figures won't be released until November 5, just a day before the General Election.  By that time many Americans will have already voted by mail or by Early Voting.    http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/10/economy-adds-tk-jobs-in-september.php

The ugly truth is that the 114,000 jobs added in September are not enough to keep up with monthly population growth. The unemployment rate of 7.8 is exactly where it was back when Barack Obama took office in 2008, yet the economy has still not recovered all the jobs lost before Obama's inauguration.  Only 4.3 million have been added back out of the 8.8 million jobs lost during the financial crisis, and the job pool has grown by another 3 million with the population.  The administration's forecast upon taking office was an unemployment rate of 5.8%  at the end of Obama's first term.   http://cowboybyte.com/13307/the-ugly-truth-about-that-great-jobs-report/

Question to ponder:

*How does the unemployment rate fall, when the number of new jobs has fallen steadily from the beginning of the year, each year for three years running?

*How do 114,000 "new jobs" jive with the fact that nearly 370,000 people filed for unemployment benefits last week alone?   http://money.cnn.com/2012/10/05/news/economy/september-jobs-report...

*The fact that there are fewer people employed than when the President's term began 2008?

*The fact that for over 11 million people who should be working are now idle or working part-time, compared to 2008?

How indeed? Simple!  We rig the accounting system. (http://blog.heritage.org/2012/10/05/the-odd-september-unemployment-rate-when-good-surveys-produce-false-results/) You are not "unemployed" unless you respond to a survey that you are still looking for work. You don't have to respond personally. Anyone in the household surveyed can respond for you. Since the survey is conducted by phone, those without phones are not included. The 7.8% number was based on a survey of fewer than 5000 households with an estimated error (reliability) of 10%.

The "Jobs Created" number is even more confused. It is based on a survey of about 150,000 companies, then adjusted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, part of the Executive Branch, to correct it for "seasonal" variances. "Variance" is not synonymous with " variation". It is an economic term which means, tongue-in-cheek, the difference between the actual data and what you would like it to be. This number does not indicate the quality of job - burning burgers or building an airplane are both jobs - nor does it reflect the increase in government jobs, which contribute strongly to reducing the unemployment figure. Without making accusations, who controls the government hiring, and who would benefit from a short term boost a month before the election?  http://www.investorwords.com/5227/variance.html

Equally important, labor statistics don't allow for the steady increase in population, consequently the number of jobs needed to maintain the same level of employment. If we don't "create" 200M to 250M new jobs each month, we are actually falling behind. We may be running in the right direction, but we're getting lapped by the pack.  The horse we're betting on stopped to graze.  

If the economy were a horse race, would we stay the course?," as President Obama asks voters to do this Fall, or would we tear up the ticket?   It would be folly to expect that horse to win, place or show, and disastrous for this nation to allow Obama's failed policies of the past four years to continue!

D'skidoc October 11, 2012 at 05:20 pm
If the economy were a horse race, the GOP would be found betting for the favorites to fall and break a leg.
D'skidoc October 11, 2012 at 05:23 pm
If the economy is a horse race, the GOP wants to allow more cheating (deregulation), and make the track rocky for all but the current front runners (eg. oil company subsidies).
D'skidoc October 11, 2012 at 05:25 pm
If the economy is a horse race, why hasn't the GOP helped build a better track and venue (infrastructure).
D'skidoc October 11, 2012 at 05:30 pm
What happens to grandma's Medicare and Soc Sec in the GOP's plans? "They shoot horses, don't they?"
D'skidoc October 11, 2012 at 05:48 pm
If the economy were a horse race, we would just now be passing the second turn of a marathon. On the last stretch, the GOP allowed the owner of the track to up his % of the take. Attendance slipped a little, but then they took out a big loan to start MMA (off in Iraq and then Afghanistan) and allowed the owners to gamble with the take and bet both for and against their own horses. When the ownners bet the farm (everybody else's money) and lost, the customers (taxpayers) were left to pick up the tab (deficit created by 2 wars and a tax cut). The customers had no more money to bet so the track suffered even more. The owners, meanwhile iinvested in tracks elsewhere (Hong Kong, China) where there were more customers, and decided to invest in the GOP to try and futher increase their % of the take (more tax cuts), rather than rebuild a better track and attract more local customers.
If the economy is a horse race, we have been racing slowly in the right direction for almost 4 years and it is time to stay the course on to daylight! VOTE DEMOCRATIC FOR THE ECONOMY!!! ps. Real income has risen more and for more people under Democratic presidents than Republicans for the past 50 years. You can look it up.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Deerfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Steven June 11, 2013 at 01:19 pm
There is nothing historical about this house. The historical house was torn down in order to buildRead More a modern house which vaguely resembles the home that was owned by Lyman Wilmot. But calling this new construction "an important part of the history of Deerfield" is a travesty.
annette kalcheim June 14, 2013 at 07:39 am
Mara, So sorry you feel this way. We feel that this really improves the neighborhood. Tried toRead More keep much of old structure, but Igor's rehab and lack of upkeep, made it impossible. couldn't even keep floors, all warped from water and walls full of mold. City did nothing to stop Igor from combining two distinct properties. I am having a champagne lunch Wed. June 19, 11:30 to 1:30. Would love for you to come and see the house. Maybe that will change your mind. Annette Kalcheim
Mara Meyer June 15, 2013 at 09:33 pm
Annette - my first statement was "beautiful house" so I have no qualms with your outcome -Read More however, this is a re-do, re-creation not the original house. But good luck! I am sure you will find a buyer quickly!
J.Lyn June 9, 2013 at 06:10 am
I neglected to include contact information. Please contact Jennifer at : j.lyn.mclick@gmail.com