.
Feedback

The Strawman Speaks: First Presidential Debate Analysis

Perhaps the most significant accomplishment for Governor Romney was that the debate, face to face with the sitting President, gave him official standing.

by Nancy Thorner and Ed Ingold of Mundelein

For months, President Obama's campaign committee has tried to define Mitt Romney with slurs, accusations and outright misrepresentations.  

Many of these were "strawman" attacks, after the medieval practice of creating a straw effigy, embuing it with the sins and misdeeds of the past year, then burning it in order get better luck in the future, which falsely claimed Governor Romney has one position or another, then attacking that position.

Well, on Wednesday night, in the first presidential debate, the "strawman" had a chance to speak.  

Predictably, President Obama repeated his accusation that Governor Romney's tax plan would give tax breaks to the wealthy and raise taxes for the middle class.  

As Governor Romney explained in his response, he never proposed anything of the sort. He would keep the so-called Bush tax cuts for everyone. In time, he would reduce the tax rates for everyone, but reduce the deductions and tax breaks in order to keep the same effective tax rates while simplifying the tax code and compliance.

Accused of not being specific, Governor Romney explained he would set the guiding principles, then work with both parties in Congress to fill in the details.  

Per Obama, Governor Romney would continue the practice of giving tax breaks to companies for exporting jobs to foreign countries.  

Romney rightly countered that in his 25 years of business experience, no such tax breaks had ever been given.  If they were available, perhaps he needed a different tax lawyer.  

One of Romney's better debate lines was in describing Obama's position that government was the solution to everything, calling it the "Trickle Down Theory of Government."   That was a clever (and accurate) way to preempt the Democratic rant about "Trickle Down Economics" of Milt Friedman (and Reagen).    useconomy.about.com/od/Politics/p/Trickle-Down-Economics-Does-It-Work.htm  

President Obama's "Nixon" moment, referring to the famous 1960 debate with Jack Kennedy, was a consequence of the split screen, which showed both candidates' faces simultaneously.  

Governor Romney paid respectful and intense attention to President Obama when the latter spoke (One learns in business that it is important to listen, and not concentrate on your next chance to speak.).  

When Romney was speaking, the President was seen to look down, mutter to himself, make faces, and to look like he wanted to be somewhere else.  

Perhaps the most significant accomplishment for Governor Romney was that the debate, face to face with the sitting President, gave him official standing. 

Before the debate, he was just another Republican contender (admittedly the last one standing), barely worthy of a ten second sound bite on the evening news.  In contrast, Obama's speeches were often broadcast in their entirety.

Small wonder that most people had no idea what Romney stands for, except as defined by his opponent. 

Governor Romney was polished, polite and most important, prepared.   The President was none of these. For more than four years, Obama has been coddled by the press, asked such probing questions as "What do you find most exciting about being President?", while surrounded by advisors who are afraid to speak their minds.

Reaction to the debate in the liberal media was a combination of disappointment and anger - anger with the President that he didn't bring up the issues thought embarrassing to Romney, and anger with the moderator, Jim Lehrer, for no particular reason.  

According to Politico, for example, Romney wants to fire Big Bird.  In fact, Romney said he wants the government to stop funding anything not critical enough to borrow money from China to support, including PBS.  

The Governor qualified this by stating he liked PBS, Big Bird, and you [Jim Lehrer] too, but it's not government's responsibility to support them. 

It's not likely the big yellow bird will be called to the office the day after Romney is inaugurated.

The next day, in Denver, Obama, a  chastised but re-energized President, said he didn't know who was on the stage with him, but it wasn't the real Romney.   "The real Romney,"  he went on to say, "is in favor of giving tax breaks to the rich, paid for by the middle class." "He wants to give tax breaks to companies who ship jobs overseas."  

This shows that the President, despite appearances, was actually paying attention during the debate.  President Obama must have heard Governor Romney's remark of how people repeat distortions in the hope that they will eventually be believed when Romney said, "I raised five sons, so I've heard all that before."     

The first debate on October 3 on Domestic Policy from the University of Denver in Denver, Colorado, can be viewed at: www.youtube.com/politics?feature=etp-gs-ype   

The President got it half right, anyway.  Obama's misstatements about Mitt Romney are now unraveling. 

As it turns out, the strawman is real, and the emperor has no clothes.  In contrasting to the Wizard of Oz, Obama's protective cloak has now been removed.  

 

McCloud October 5, 2012 at 09:10 pm
A TKO in favor of Romney, who was able to communicate conservative principles effectively. Those principles are no match against collectivist ideals and four years of consequences.
Sergey Kemskiy October 12, 2012 at 10:42 am
I must confess that your writing on taxation is impressive. Issues regarding taxation and IRS are crucial for every business, that is why it is important to have a contact of a good tax lawyer. That is why I am trying to create the directory of the best US tax attorneys with detailed description of their legal practice. For example, look a category related to Illinois http://attorney-online.info/dir/tax/illinois/909 You must be a good tax attorney. If you are, you should submit your contacts to the attorney directory.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Deerfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
RB June 19, 2013 at 09:16 pm
This is just about the part where you NRA folks start spewing the "can't infringe upon theRead More right to bear arms" lingo in the 2nd. Well, guess what? Constitutionally we as citizens can! It's been done before and will again. The Supreme Court has never said you folks can carry an RPG, so I guess they "infringed" huh? Mindless farmers with the God and Guns signs along the highway here next? Keep your pistols and hunting rifles...it's assault weapons that we're discussing keeping out of this Village and we can infringe upon them all we want....Constitutionally!
Dan Cox June 19, 2013 at 09:27 pm
RB, You do not understand Heller or McDonald or the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court never saidRead More we can't carry an RPG either! Wilson has been going on for over 6 years, but it will strike down Cook Counties infringement and we will once again...collect Millions in Legal fees.
Steven June 11, 2013 at 01:19 pm
There is nothing historical about this house. The historical house was torn down in order to buildRead More a modern house which vaguely resembles the home that was owned by Lyman Wilmot. But calling this new construction "an important part of the history of Deerfield" is a travesty.
annette kalcheim June 14, 2013 at 07:39 am
Mara, So sorry you feel this way. We feel that this really improves the neighborhood. Tried toRead More keep much of old structure, but Igor's rehab and lack of upkeep, made it impossible. couldn't even keep floors, all warped from water and walls full of mold. City did nothing to stop Igor from combining two distinct properties. I am having a champagne lunch Wed. June 19, 11:30 to 1:30. Would love for you to come and see the house. Maybe that will change your mind. Annette Kalcheim
Mara Meyer June 15, 2013 at 09:33 pm
Annette - my first statement was "beautiful house" so I have no qualms with your outcome -Read More however, this is a re-do, re-creation not the original house. But good luck! I am sure you will find a buyer quickly!
J.Lyn June 9, 2013 at 06:10 am
I neglected to include contact information. Please contact Jennifer at : j.lyn.mclick@gmail.com