HPHS Renovations: If Not Now, When?

A Highland Park resident explains why he's supporting the District 113 referendum.

This editorial is written as a response to Ed Brill's most recent column,

Ed, thank you for a very thoughtful, well-reasoned and informative piece – I particularly appreciate the links to the District 113 websites. I also like to hear the opinions of people who grew up in Highland Park and who obviously have the town’s best interests at heart. As an undecided voter, your piece inspired me to take a tour last night of  (HPHS).

Like you, I don’t like the idea of spending money on the – really, our resources should focus on academics and on preparing our kids for the challenging world they face. You also make a good point about coordinating expenditures between District 112 and 113 (it would be great if there was just one school district covering Highland Park (maybe someday)).  District 112 also has significant needs (a topic too large to address in this post). 

However, I decided to support the referendum based on answering several questions. I don’t know the situation at Deerfield High School, so my analysis is purely based on Highland Park.

First, is there a significant investment need at the HPHS?  Clearly, the answer is yes. There are immediate concerns – drainage, HVAC, water damage, plumbing, windows – and there are longer-term concerns – space usage, layout, classroom size, athletic facilities, technology upgrades, reduced maintenance costs, etc.

Second, does it make financial sense to address the immediate concerns without addressing some of the longer-term issues? I think the answer is no. I don’t see how you truly fix the drainage, HVAC, etc. in the B and C wings without spending millions and millions of dollars. Were these wings of HPHS a house, it would never make financial sense to put money into fixing them up – it would be throwing good money after bad. If one agrees with this conclusion and decides to tear down these wings (and the two gyms located in them), then, unfortunately, the need for additional gym space arises and the wisdom of building a new field house (with a new pool) becomes apparent.

Finally, when should this investment be made?  Now or 10 to 15 years from now?  We could continue to make the same repairs year-after-year, letting things continue to gradually deteriorate and just make do. This is clearly a question of values, priorities and individual finances. Are Highland Parkers like the family that has maxed out its credit cards and is behind on the mortgage, or do we collectively have greater financial wherewithal than that? I’d like to think the latter is true.

As a society, we like to kick the can down the road – frankly, I think we have done too much of it.  We all benefit from the massive investments made by prior residents to our schools, parks and other infrastructure – none of which probably made a lot of financial sense at the time for individual taxpayers. It seems to me that this is our time to step up – particularly given the low interest rate environment and a bond issue rolling off. Will it ever be any easier in the future to ask for a tax increase to do this?

Daniel Jenks has lived in Highland Park with his family for almost 14 years. He has two daughters, one who attends  and one who attends . He's a stay-at-home dad who formerly practiced law at Mayer Brown

David Greenberg March 18, 2011 at 03:07 PM
As said above: I agree that the referendum is in regard to D113 and not D112 or D109. However, as I've said previously, taxing bodies can no longer operate in a vacuum and have to start working together to achieve efficiencies and cost savings. To ignore the needs of D112 and D109, seems extremely short-sighted to me. Admittedly, I'm better versed in some financial issues for D112 because I sat on a Budget Reduction Task Force for D112 and live within the D112 District. But D113 overlaps both D112 and D109, and the students from those Districts feed into D113 - simply brushing aside the needs of D112/D109 shortchanges those students at the expense of D113's wants. Focusing on D113's needs can help D112/D109 to meet their needs as well. I haven't made the argument that they're operating at a deficit so we ought to ignore D113's needs. In fact, I've made the argument that D113, D112, and D109 have needs, and rather than shortchanging the students in the elementary districts, it's incumbent upon D113 to focus on it's NEEDS instead of it's WISH-LIST. D113 has needs, they should be met.
John Adorjan March 23, 2011 at 01:23 PM
Is this The David Greenberg Show?
Samantha Stolberg March 23, 2011 at 03:09 PM
Beth and Jim- My "McMansion" is generating a lot more in property taxes then the 2K square foot home that was here before it. It's construction also gave the City quite a bit of money in Permit fees. Oh, and think of all the contractors I employed for a whole year.... Hmmmm. Maybe you should be a little more grateful for all I have given and am giving to the City every year.
Samantha Stolberg March 23, 2011 at 03:12 PM
I spent 4 years at HPHS and never dipped so much as a toe in that pool. Those students that use the pool for EXTRA-curricular activities should take inspiration from the Football team and attempt to get the repairs/improvements paid for through PRIVATE donations. Perhaps a local swim school would be interested in co-sponsoring it?
Samantha Stolberg March 23, 2011 at 03:16 PM
At last week's BDR hearing, Greg Kurr from 112 said that 112 CAN'T have a referendum now BECAUSE of 113. It's documented on 112's website if you care to watch the recording of the meeting. There are many issue facing 112 NOW. For example: 100 year-old Lincoln School needs to be torn down and rebuilt.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »