.
Feedback

Commercial Recycling Draws Wide Support

Though Village Board members like the concept, not everyone wants to see a commercial scavenger franchise.

Recycling of commercial waste is a step closer to reality after Mayor Harriet Rosenthal and the Board of Trustees directed Village Manager Kent Street and his staff to begin the bidding process at Monday’ Committee of the Whole meeting.

Though the Village will prepare a request for proposal (RFP) to be discussed by the Board and the public, the project potentially remains two years from implementation, according to Jennifer Maltas, assistant to Street.

Earlier: Board Seeks Cut of Tax Levy Proposal

The procedure for employing a commercial scavenger franchise is governed by state law, according to Maltas. Once the RFP is ready there must be a public hearing at which time the document could be altered.

After the hearing, the RFP is issued by Deerfield allowing any qualified hauler to bid. Once the bids are returned, the Village will prepare a proposed contract for the winner.

There will be another public hearing on the contract at which time the Board can vote to accept it. Should that happen, state law requires a 15-month waiting period before enactment, according to Maltas.

The process actually began six months ago when Maltas and the Deerfield-Bannockburn-Riverwoods Chamber of Commerce sent Deerfield’s businesses a survey to learn the existing costs, frequency of service and the amount of recyclers.

“There was a 14 percent response rate,” Maltas said. “This is not unusually low for this situation,” she added about the response. She said 49 percent were of Deerfield’s businesses were recycling at the time of the survey.

Though all Board members who spoke favored the proposal, not everyone in the room was happy with the idea of one hauler for all of Deerfield’s businesses. Robert Pfister, municipal marketing manager for scavenger Veolia Environmental Services wants the choice to remain in the hands of each business owner.

“I’m opposed to a commercial franchise. The free market is the way to go. If they (business owners) want to recycle it’s their choice,” Pfister said. “You will not see those prices again,” he added referring to the fees paid in Highland Park and Highwood which both have a commercial franchise.

Trustee William Seiden felt the Village could obtain the best value by negotiating on behalf of the entire business community. “We can get a good price,” he said.

Chamber of Commerce Chairman David Levitz voiced concern that while the project may be good for a majority of businesses some will be unhappy. “Please be certain some of the local businesses in Deerfield are included (in the process),” he said. “If 85 percent win, 15 percent lose and we don’t want to alienate them.”

Trustee Barbara Struthers welcomes the Chamber’s involvement. “We do what we can to encourage commercial recycling,” she said. “Working with the Chamber is the best group to work with.”

Rosenthal echoed the opinion of Struthers and Levitz. “The RFP process is not an easy process and we want to make sure the business community is involved,” she said.

One person who has been working with the Village is SWALCO (Solid Waste Agency of Lake County) Executive Director Walter Willis. He is pleased with the idea.

“It’s an opportunity to reduce the number of trucks on the street and increase recycling too,” Willis said. “It is a win-win in the best spirit of sustainability.” He also indicated the business communities of Highland Park and Highwood experienced a savings with a commercial franchise.

For more news and updates, "like" us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

Walter White November 28, 2012 at 11:36 am
The Veolia guy was unhappy with the decision? What a surprise. They were godawful. My trash was strewn all over my lawn on many an occasion.
Beth November 28, 2012 at 02:10 pm
The Veolia guy's point was less regulation. What if they win the bid? You have no choice but to have them as your vendor and they were g-awful?
Less trucks? Common sense is same amount of trucks just esthetically looks better. Perhaps "same trucks" would have been more accurate. Every business should recycle so let's require that. Charge the refuge companies permit fees (revenue) and let the businesses make their own choices. (Freedom)And here's another proposal... Lets require these scavengers who steal recyclables (theft) out of my garbage and are scoping our neighborhoods (creepy)all day long- scavenger fees and license fees/fines (revenue) They steal my recyclables and sell them for profit to recycle plants. (Theft with profit) Steve, there's not wide support here. 14% response is wide support? How many of those were for recycling but against regulation?
Resident November 29, 2012 at 03:07 pm
Beth has been practicing her writing. Big words and all. Good job Beth. AGAIN.... Your husband (not you) has an interest in a commmercial recycling company....
RonnieTheLimoDriver November 29, 2012 at 04:49 pm
Here is a proposal. Require commercial recycling. Go forward with the RFP to identify the lowest bidder to provide the service. Give businesses that find a better deal or want to stay with their current company the option to opt out. That way freedom of choice and free markets still exist, recycling occurs, and the govt. doesn't pick winners and losers. Small businesses get the advantage of pooling their buying power.
Beth November 30, 2012 at 02:09 pm
Resident: don't we all have an interest in where our money is spent?
FYI: Commercial recycling is different then solid waste and the proposal on the table. Totally different animal - I/we would not benefit . C & D aka construction debris is what we do - so once again a comment that is accusatory and misleading without being truthful. I speak on this issue because there are underlying issues the residents should be aware of because i am educated in this field not because of a benefit . People tend to speak about things they know about & what's important to them. Big words? Why the criticism? I love that you chose to degrade me and my verbiage. Shows your character rather then focusing on opinion and debate. Since you don't know the difference of the two - solid waste and construction debris - dont make comments that are untruthful ....
Beth November 30, 2012 at 02:11 pm
Ronnie- exactly!!!! Finally an educated response!!!
Thank you

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Deerfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Dan Cox June 19, 2013 at 09:27 pm
RB, You do not understand Heller or McDonald or the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court never saidRead More we can't carry an RPG either! Wilson has been going on for over 6 years, but it will strike down Cook Counties infringement and we will once again...collect Millions in Legal fees.
RB June 19, 2013 at 09:54 pm
RPG was used as an example of limitations. To quote from the majority opinion inRead More Heller...."Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose"
Dan Cox June 19, 2013 at 10:11 pm
RB Yet, the Supreme Court has not deemed what that limitation is, because the writters of the SecondRead More Amendment, wrote it for the protection of the citizens, against a Tyrannical Government. If we want to really get to the heart of the matter, there is no limitation as to "WHAT" we may Bear, depending on the "purpose." Now if you wish to fall back on the Militia arguement... Illinois State Constitution, Article12, Militia..."Every resident of the State of Illinois, is a Member of the Illinois State Militia." Secondly, the Bill of Right's is for the citizens, not members of the Military, like the Army National Guard, obviously.
Steven June 11, 2013 at 01:19 pm
There is nothing historical about this house. The historical house was torn down in order to buildRead More a modern house which vaguely resembles the home that was owned by Lyman Wilmot. But calling this new construction "an important part of the history of Deerfield" is a travesty.
annette kalcheim June 14, 2013 at 07:39 am
Mara, So sorry you feel this way. We feel that this really improves the neighborhood. Tried toRead More keep much of old structure, but Igor's rehab and lack of upkeep, made it impossible. couldn't even keep floors, all warped from water and walls full of mold. City did nothing to stop Igor from combining two distinct properties. I am having a champagne lunch Wed. June 19, 11:30 to 1:30. Would love for you to come and see the house. Maybe that will change your mind. Annette Kalcheim
Mara Meyer June 15, 2013 at 09:33 pm
Annette - my first statement was "beautiful house" so I have no qualms with your outcome -Read More however, this is a re-do, re-creation not the original house. But good luck! I am sure you will find a buyer quickly!
J.Lyn June 9, 2013 at 06:10 am
I neglected to include contact information. Please contact Jennifer at : j.lyn.mclick@gmail.com