.
Feedback

Dold Outraises Schneider by $135,396

Intensity increases in race for 10th District seat.

Rep. Robert Dold (R-Kenilworth) outraised his Democratic opponent, Brad Schneider of Deerfield, by $135,396 for the quarter ending June 30, according to releases from both campaigns.

Schneider, with $567,000 cash on hand for the Nov. 6 general election contest against Dold, currently has just over a quarter of the war chest Dold has accumulated since he was elected in 2010. The Congressman has $2.1 million in the bank.

For the quarter, Dold brought in $717,396 while Schneider raised $582,000, according to the news releases.

Since he stated his campaign, Schneider has accumulated $1,517,840 but had to spend heavily to win a contested four-way primary in March, according to reports filed with the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

Without a contested primary, Dold began his fundraising efforts shortly after his election and has taken in $2,934,913 for the current election cycle, according to FEC reports.

Both Schneider and Dold raised the bulk of their money locally. Statewide donors provided 82 percent of Dold’s funds and 80 percent of Schneider’s money, according to the separate news releases. Sixty five percent of Schneider’s haul came from first-time donors.

The campaign promises to be an expensive one. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and other Democratic leaning groups have committed $5.7 million to advertising in the Chicago market for three contested House races after Sept. 1.

Republican groups have yet to reserve television time in the Chicago market.

In addition to the 10th Congressional District, the DCCC has targeted the 8th and 11th Districts.

Carl Lambrecht July 11, 2012 at 01:13 pm
.Left to right to moderate. All agree we do not need corruption. Yet look at our state of Illinois.
Baretta July 11, 2012 at 01:26 pm
Amen McC
Gary July 11, 2012 at 02:15 pm
Which of these two is more likely to vote for policies that will stop the spending, cut regulations, reform crippling entitlements, strengthen the economy, and increase jobs?
Bob Dold Which is more likely to keep us on the path of $trillion annual deficits, job killing regulations, increase entitlements and dependency, wasteful spending, arbitrary bullying governance, and the corrosive tactic of dividing the country for political gain? Brad Schneider
Anne July 11, 2012 at 02:20 pm
when Dold pledges his allegiance to Grover Norquist, he has made his bed, he no longer represents his constituents he is a foot solider to Norquist and the rest of the Teabaggers. He is no moderate he is no fiscal conservative. His corruption is just the type of "honorable" corruption that conservatives approve of. The 10th needs an independent that can vote to represent the PEOPLE of the 10th not an individual. To quote another poster, "Dold is Sold"
Gary July 11, 2012 at 03:41 pm
Here is the pledge that Bod Dold signed. There's nothing scary about this. All it says is that Dold won't raise our taxes. Why won't Brad Schneider sign it?
"Taxpayer Protection Pledge I, _______________, pledge to the taxpayers of the _____ district of the state of__________, and to the American people that I will: ONE, oppose any and all efforts to increase the marginal income tax rates for individuals and/or businesses; and TWO, oppose any net reduction or elimination of deductions and credits, unless matched dollar for dollar by further reducing tax rates."
Brian July 11, 2012 at 03:43 pm
I understand what you are trying to say, but you are lumping everything together and it doesn't work that way. So many of the right want the govt to just go away...I'm sure an anarchistic America would work really really well. And again, freedom of choice sounds good from the soapbox but when your freedom of choice can directly/adversely effect the people around you that is a problem. A woman's choice doesn't concern you or your soul. Letting currently illegal drugs flood the market can effect others, arming everyone who wants a gun can effect everyone. There are differences.
The right loves to talk about nanny state and sheep and towing the line of the govt. You throw out super extremes to make yourselves sound like the only voice of reason. I lean very much to left on most issues...I'm not on welfare, I'm not sucking up govt funds, and I have no problem with some of the taxes I pay going to help the less fortunate. Of course their are leaches on the systems and that is wrong and should be addressed, but I have known too many people who have gotten back on their feet thanks to those programs to say they are bad.
Louis G. Atsaves July 11, 2012 at 03:51 pm
I remain fascinated how the Tea Party remains angry with Dold and his votes, and the Democrats falsely insist in claiming that Dold votes in lock step with the Tea Party. So if Dold votes "the party line" 82% of the time, May 87% and Garrett 85%, why do Democrats insist that May and Garrett are "independent Democrats" and Dold is a Puppet of the Tea Party? Talk about a double standard?
The Q July 11, 2012 at 03:53 pm
Sorry Brian.....but Drugs only hurt those who take them, just like Abortion, and I should have the choice. Dems can not have it both ways, you can not say I should have the freedom to terminate an unborn child but not other freedoms. So it sounds to me like you are for abortions and not only abortions but the government should pay for them ( many taxpayers religious beliefs are against abortion) but when its comes to my other freedoms I am out of luck......
And Like I said above cutting off funding for PP is not cutting off your choices as a women. If you make irresponsible decisions then you should pay for it not me or the other tax payers. And yes I lump these all together because they are my personal choices and freedoms, guns don't kill people, people kill people. But Abortions do kill unborn babies....... and I still think a women should have that right to a choice. Even though that unborn baby does not.......
The Q July 11, 2012 at 03:54 pm
Gary thats horrible......how dare he sign something that says he wont raise my taxes......lol
Tom B. July 11, 2012 at 03:55 pm
How can you keep going on and on and on with the claim that Bob Dold is a Tea Partier? Congressional Quarterly, GovTrack, and National Journal have consistently ranked him as one of the most moderate and centrist members of congress. Congressional Quarterly cited Dold as the #1 Republican most willing to work with President Obama......Does that sound like a Tea Partier to anyone?
RB July 11, 2012 at 04:32 pm
Louis, you keep mentioning his overall vote record and I keep clarifying that it is padding to appear moderate when they don't need his vote for a right wing agenda bill. He is voting to repeal healthcare for children up to age 26 on parents, no per existing conditions etc. today.
Gary, Norquist limits them to even getting rid of loopholes if it raises net revenue. Loopholes for BP a foreign number one or two revenue company and we let them pay lower taxes. No flexibility from Norquist and some Republicans are revolting from the pledge and willing to compromise for the country. Not Dold.
The Q July 11, 2012 at 04:38 pm
RB he voting to repeal a Tax increase and limits on your choices of health care........Had the President and Democrats been honest with the American public this would have been defeated a long time ago. But that's your Hope and Change......
RB July 11, 2012 at 04:39 pm
Tom, the Tea Party endorsed Mr. Dold in 2010. His voting record becomes moderate if they don't need his vote, either a bill is already going to fail or it is winning by a wide margin so he gets to vote more in line with his District. Today, he is voting to repeal healthcare for children on parents policies up to age 26, the end to pre existing conditions, tort reform, insurance instead of free riders, etc.
RB July 11, 2012 at 05:46 pm
It was not a tax until the other day, its a tax penalty for not being responsible and buying health insurance, and it is small, a small price to pay for healthcare for everyone. Why do you like 'free riders' - those that show up at ER's clogging the system with a sore throat and never paying their bills? Doesn't sound very Republican to me, but to each his own. And the individual mandate? A Republican plan until Mr. Obama included it at their urging. Dold is no moderate.
RB July 11, 2012 at 05:50 pm
Mr. Dold was very much against the stimulus, until he was for it.....
WASHINGTON -- An ardent opponent of the federal stimulus plan showed up Monday in Winnetka, Ill., to smile and cut the ribbon at a ceremony unveiling a local project funded by that very stimulus. "Originally built in the 1940s, the [train] station not only got a facelift but three heated platform warming shelters, two new elevators and a new pedestrian bridge to allow commuters to wait in the station and then quickly cross over the tracks to the Chicago-bound platform," Winnetka-Glencoe Patch reported Tuesday morning.
The Q July 11, 2012 at 05:52 pm
@ RB is that you Nancy (Pelosi)
Those "Freeriders" were the poor uninsured until last week......lol And tell that to the Govt lawyers who argued that it was a TAX. Once again the Dems want it both ways. you really cant make this stuff up if you tried. And IL is dead broke so when the expansion of medicare coverage by the Feds is gone in 5 years, that's more Billions IL does not have and can not afford.
McCloud July 11, 2012 at 05:53 pm
He is voting to remove taxes on the children and their childrens children as this virus unravels. Before the bill was passed uninsured people were described as victims of the horrors from insurance companies, now they are called freeloaders. Watch your back when a liberal uses you in their fallacious world.
McCloud July 11, 2012 at 06:05 pm
Code Pink man is trying to smear, confuse and use children, another day in the life of a liberal.
The Q July 11, 2012 at 06:26 pm
when you cant win fair.....rig the game in your favor. The Chicago machine at its best.
Penny Novy July 11, 2012 at 09:22 pm
MS, you are correct--there is no 'war on women.' This is something manufactured by the left to take votes from Mitt Romney.
Ellie July 12, 2012 at 01:38 am
for Dan Pritzker - Thank goodness Rep. Dold voted against Obama's takeover of our healthcare! I don't want my doctor getting his directives straight from the government as I sit in his examining room: Watch Doc type into his laptop my age and diagnosis, and get back a red light (no) or green light (yes). (There will be a formula, of course). Say goodbye to the doctor-patient relationship. Say hello to rationing. Seniors beware! Obama was never, ever pro-life....
Louis G. Atsaves July 12, 2012 at 01:46 am
There is your answer Tom B. RB refuses to face reality or facts. And by the way RB, the mandate was ALWAYS a tax. The Obama Administration and Nancy Pelosi lied about it, called it a "fee" and then argued before the U.S. Supreme Court that it WAS a TAX! After the Supreme Court agreed with the Obama Administration that it WAS a TAX, then Obama and his White House aides tried to claim again it was only a fee. Who is voting to support the lies? Not Dold, THANK GOD!
Louis G. Atsaves July 12, 2012 at 01:51 am
Ellie, interesting reading in the LA Times about healthcare systems in other countries. In Japan, they run you through assembly machine style, and the doctor sees you but for a minute before moving on to the next patient. Has to see so many patients a day to make a profit. That is where we are heading. Next time you hear a Democrat proclaim that healthcare is "free" run for the hills. The 21 tax increases that come with this "free" healthcare the rest of us are paying for will be just the tip of the iceberg. And wasn't it Nancy Pelosi who famously said we can read this bill AFTER they pass it? No wonder!
HOLLY SIGMAN July 12, 2012 at 12:46 pm
We need more republicans in this state not dems. Vote Obama out
The Q July 12, 2012 at 12:48 pm
sadly Holly with an electoral system our vote for president in IL is a waste.......all the sheep go to the polls like zombies and vote for the big O. Vote early and vote often, the Chicago way.
dold's supporter July 27, 2012 at 04:24 pm
Congressman Robert Dold does not steal any money from his employees. Those money belong to the Company and thus, to the owner. Besides, the overtime laws favor the lazy employees and I hope Congressman Dold will change them because paying an employee overtime might hurt the business up to the point of closing down.
A. M. Kelly July 27, 2012 at 05:22 pm
Sorry, "Q"...Illinois Republicans are just as good at "rigging the game" as Illinois Democrats, and when a Republican governor is in, they do the very same "re-districting" as Democratic governors.
For really Big Time rigging, though, you have to go to the national level and see the their rigging attempts in the November election to favor Romney via the Voter Supression laws they've enacted in states with Republican Governors, a fact which a couple of them have even been stupid enough to openly admit!
A. M. Kelly July 27, 2012 at 05:23 pm
Good luck, Holly...Bwahahahah!
A. M. Kelly July 27, 2012 at 05:38 pm
Oh Sure...One really DOES have to be warring on women, though, when one attempts mandatory & medically NON-necessary vaginal probes for women seeking abortions like the dumbass governor of Virginia tried, not an attempt by to outlaw hormonal BIRTH Control, by the finest mind Fifth Century, Rick Santorum..Then of course,there's the awful Republican Issa, who held a hearing on the legitmacy of birth control coverage in the affordable care act with men ONLY, having the gall to turn away even the ONE woman his "committee" found worthy to join them...But no, of COURSE, there's no "Republican war on women, LOL.
Thank goodness, at least, that Santorum got sent back to the Dark Ages and Governor Probe had to rescind his law due to an ONSLAUGHT of protest by women in the congress and in his state. Obama is currently leading Romney by at least Ten points...Keep going, Repubs, we're loving it!
A. M. Kelly July 27, 2012 at 05:49 pm
I love you Repubs....You are all "up in arms" -- nice choice of words -- about Planned Parenthood because 3 percent of its services go to abortions, but you have NO problem letting insane people like Holmes In Colorado order ASSAULT WEAPONS and their hundred shot magazines through the MAIL so they can take out Innocent people at a movie...,Duhh....And yeah, "Q", we "libs" are not only NOT against the Second Amerndment and "owning a firearm", some of us OWN THEM ourselves, like ME....Oh well, why tell the truth when lying works better, right?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Deerfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Dan Cox June 19, 2013 at 09:27 pm
RB, You do not understand Heller or McDonald or the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court never saidRead More we can't carry an RPG either! Wilson has been going on for over 6 years, but it will strike down Cook Counties infringement and we will once again...collect Millions in Legal fees.
RB June 19, 2013 at 09:54 pm
RPG was used as an example of limitations. To quote from the majority opinion inRead More Heller...."Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose"
Dan Cox June 19, 2013 at 10:11 pm
RB Yet, the Supreme Court has not deemed what that limitation is, because the writters of the SecondRead More Amendment, wrote it for the protection of the citizens, against a Tyrannical Government. If we want to really get to the heart of the matter, there is no limitation as to "WHAT" we may Bear, depending on the "purpose." Now if you wish to fall back on the Militia arguement... Illinois State Constitution, Article12, Militia..."Every resident of the State of Illinois, is a Member of the Illinois State Militia." Secondly, the Bill of Right's is for the citizens, not members of the Military, like the Army National Guard, obviously.
Steven June 11, 2013 at 01:19 pm
There is nothing historical about this house. The historical house was torn down in order to buildRead More a modern house which vaguely resembles the home that was owned by Lyman Wilmot. But calling this new construction "an important part of the history of Deerfield" is a travesty.
annette kalcheim June 14, 2013 at 07:39 am
Mara, So sorry you feel this way. We feel that this really improves the neighborhood. Tried toRead More keep much of old structure, but Igor's rehab and lack of upkeep, made it impossible. couldn't even keep floors, all warped from water and walls full of mold. City did nothing to stop Igor from combining two distinct properties. I am having a champagne lunch Wed. June 19, 11:30 to 1:30. Would love for you to come and see the house. Maybe that will change your mind. Annette Kalcheim
Mara Meyer June 15, 2013 at 09:33 pm
Annette - my first statement was "beautiful house" so I have no qualms with your outcome -Read More however, this is a re-do, re-creation not the original house. But good luck! I am sure you will find a buyer quickly!
J.Lyn June 9, 2013 at 06:10 am
I neglected to include contact information. Please contact Jennifer at : j.lyn.mclick@gmail.com