.
Feedback

Poll Results: Campaign Finance Laws Must Change

All but one respondent to Patch poll want donors to superpacs to fall under the same rules as campaign contributors.

Though the contest for the 10th Congressional District seat between Rep. Elect Brad Schneider (D-Deerfield) and Rep. Robert Dold (R-Kenilworth) was very close, there was near unanimity about reader dislike for the $13.1 million spent on the campaign.

A survey of Patch readers asked whether people who make unlimited donations on independent expenditures should fall under the same disclosure requirements as donors to the Schneider and Dold campaigns as well.

Earlier: Poll: Was Too Much Spent on Schneider-Dold Race

Of the 20 people who answered the question, 19 believe the requirements should be the same. Only one person would keep the law as defined in the Citizens United Case by the United States Supreme Court in 2010 intact.

“Yes, too much was spent--especially from outside,” reader Samuel Ramey wrote.

“Yes -- this is ridiculous amounts of money,” T.J. Wheeler added.

Others were upset with not only the money spent on the Congressional campaign, but on Illinois General Assembly races as well. Each time Merrill Medansky got a call or looked at the mail, it was a reminder of spending run amok.

“I feel too much was spent not only on the race for 10th congressional district, but state senate and state representative as well,” Medansky wrote. “The mailings and rob calls were not only not informative but a nearly daily reminder of how much money could have been used so much more effectively for food pantries and other social service agencies all across the district.

Steve Firestone November 15, 2012 at 08:45 pm
I would say it the other way. The same rules that apply to PACs should apply the the candidates.
LTH November 16, 2012 at 01:56 am
Currently, Political Action Committees are limited in much the same way as Candidates' Campaigns. The issue comes with thee so called "Super PACs," which are a different type of legal organization than normal PACs. I do agree though that these Super PACs need to be regulated.
I fundamentally disagree with the idea that "Corporations are People" and believe Super PACs need to be regulated, or even made illegal.
Jac Charlier November 16, 2012 at 03:30 am
What about this...only individuals can donate and that has reasonable caps on it for the primary and general election. No corporations or unions as they are not individuals. Like Term Limits, not ideal but necessary.
Joe November 16, 2012 at 02:14 pm
The misuse of 501(c)(3) non-profits is the real problem in politics today. George Soros and Rupert Murdock use them when they support their Left- or Right-wing fringe groups. And taxpayers pay for both. Corporate CEOs and unions that want to invest in so-called non-partisan (yet biased) “think tanks” like Cato or Heritage, when they want to develop slanted studies that support their agendas and block others (like blocking legislation that would increase their tax liability but increase yours). I am not sure if anyone looked at the mailings or small print this election cycle, but if you did you will find out it was 100% 501(c) driven.
Steve Firestone November 16, 2012 at 03:27 pm
There should be no regulations on free speech. The same lack of regulations for the Super PACs should apply to the PACs and the campaigns. Every time Campaign Finance Reform is tried, the unexpected consequences kick in, and it's worse than before. As for business not being people, I'm all for it. But, you may have a hard time suing them, and in return we should stop taxing them. If you think about it, every tax on a corporation is paid by us in reduced products, services, quality, or higher prices. So really, it's just a double tax on us.
Jon Hall November 27, 2012 at 02:18 pm
I'd like to hear what that FATHEAD Louis G. Atsav us has to say now.
TRUYTUIYTI November 30, 2012 at 04:10 am
http://www.coachfactoryoutletcc.us Coach Factory Outlet
http://www.guccibeltsoutletstores.net Gucci Belt http://www.coachoutletonlinewo.com Coach Factory Store http://www.coachfactorystoredo.com Coach Outlet Online http://www.coachfactoryoutletpo.com Coach Factory Online Store http://www.coachoutletonlinefc.org Coach Online Outlet http://www.coachoutletloa.com Coach Factory Outlet Online http://www.coachoutletwr.com Coach Bags Outlet http://www.coachoutletonlineyu.net Coach Factory Online http://www.coachfactoryonlineen.com Coach Factory Online http://www.hermesbeltsod.net Hermes Belt http://www.coachoutletonlinefs.com Coach Factory Outlet http://www.coachoutletstoreps.com Coach Outlet Store Online http://www.coachfactoryoutletbo.net Coach Factory Online http://www.coachfactoryoutletdt.us Coach Factory Stores http://www.coachoutletstoreonlinert.com Coach Handbags Outlet http://www.coachoutletonlinelsa.com Coach Factory Outlet http://www.coachoutletdt.net Coach Factory Store http://www.coachoutletstorefb.com Coach Bags Outlet Online http://www.coachbagsoutleton.org Coach Factory Online http://www.louisvuittonbeltsdt.net Louis Vuitton Belt
guee November 30, 2012 at 08:25 am
called in his book a “healthy debate” http://www.coachfactoryoutletcc.us /Coach Outlet Onlineover troop levels in the country.But the president’s decision to tap
Mr. Petraeus to command the war in Afghanistan, http://www.guccibeltsoutletstores.net /Gucci Beltsand later picking him to lead the C.I.A., effectively ended lingering concerns among Obama political advisers that the http://www.coachoutletonlinewo.com /Coach Outlet Storepopular general might challenge his commander in chief during the election.Mr. Petraeus and his wife met http://www.coachfactorystoredo.com /Coach Factory Onlinewhen he was a cadet at West Point; she was the daughter of the academy’s superintendent and a student at Dickinson http://www.coachfactoryoutletpo.com /Coach Factory Outlet OnlineCollegeinPennsylvania.condemnation on Wednesday.“ The Egyptian people, the Egyptian leadership, http://www.coachoutletonlinefc.org /Coach Outlet Onlinethe Egyptian government and all of Egypt is standing with all its

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Deerfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Steven June 11, 2013 at 01:19 pm
There is nothing historical about this house. The historical house was torn down in order to buildRead More a modern house which vaguely resembles the home that was owned by Lyman Wilmot. But calling this new construction "an important part of the history of Deerfield" is a travesty.
annette kalcheim June 14, 2013 at 07:39 am
Mara, So sorry you feel this way. We feel that this really improves the neighborhood. Tried toRead More keep much of old structure, but Igor's rehab and lack of upkeep, made it impossible. couldn't even keep floors, all warped from water and walls full of mold. City did nothing to stop Igor from combining two distinct properties. I am having a champagne lunch Wed. June 19, 11:30 to 1:30. Would love for you to come and see the house. Maybe that will change your mind. Annette Kalcheim
Mara Meyer June 15, 2013 at 09:33 pm
Annette - my first statement was "beautiful house" so I have no qualms with your outcome -Read More however, this is a re-do, re-creation not the original house. But good luck! I am sure you will find a buyer quickly!
J.Lyn June 9, 2013 at 06:10 am
I neglected to include contact information. Please contact Jennifer at : j.lyn.mclick@gmail.com