.
Feedback

Update: Dold, Kirk Want Changes to Affordable Care Act, Schakowsky Praises Decision

Local politicians reacted Thursday to the Supreme Court's 5–4 decision to uphold President Obama's Affordable Care Act.

(Update at 2:15 p.m.) Rep. Robert Dold (R-Kenilworth) wants to make change to some parts of the Affordable Care Act and retain other provisions in the wake of today’s United States Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision to uphold the law.

“We need to put in place provisions we’ve talked about and repeal some of the others,” Dold said today. “I consider the doctor-patient relationship sacrosanct and nothing should come in between that.”

Among other things, Dold wants to get rid of the Independent Patient Advisory Board, a 15-member panel created by the Affordable Care Act charged with finding Medicare savings.

Dold wants to retain the provisions allowing people under 26 to remain on their parents’ coverage and those that prohibit an insurer from withholding coverage from a person because of a pre-existing medical condition. One of Dold’s biggest concerns is the cost of health care.

“I have seen health care costs for my employees rise over 44 percent in the last two years,” Dold said. “This bill fails to improve the quality of health care and it fails to reduce the cost of health care for the American people.”

, on the Affordable Care Act.

(Earlier at 11:55) fears today’s United States Supreme Court decision upholding President Obama’s Affordable Care Act will threaten the country’s economic recovery, according to a statement issued by his office.

Kirk called for repeal of the law. He wants to replace it with reforms that will foster competition in the insurance industry and give people more options purchasing protection.

“The health care law threatens our economic recovery by raising taxes, imposing new regulations and creating a drag on the economy," Kirk said in the statement. "Congress (should) replace it with common sense, centrist reforms that give Americans the right to buy insurance across state lines and expand coverage without raising taxes.”

(Earlier: 10 a.m.) Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Evanston) called today historic with the decision of the United States Supreme Court to uphold the Affordable Care Act considering it the most significant law Congress has passed in the last 50 years.

“The law ends insurance industry abuses in the health system, improves Medicare and Medicaid for seniors and the disabled, and covers millions of uninsured Americans,” Schakowsky said in a prepared statement.

According to Schakowsky, more than 86 million Americans have already benefitted from the new law including 6.6 million people under 26 who can remain on their parents’ existing coverage. She thinks it should be a start not a finish.

“This positive decision by the nation’s highest court in the land should resolve any doubts that Congress can and should act to ensure that Americans get the health care they need at a price they can afford,” Schakowsky said. “It will allow us to move forward and maintain our commitment to real health care security.” 

The Court’s decision means when the law is fully in place in two more years, people can no longer be denied coverage because of pre-existing conditions. “No longer will families be bankrupt because someone gets sick,” Schakowsky said. “People with mental illness will get the care they need.” 

Patch will have comments from Rep. Robert Dold (R-Kenilworth) this afternoon. 

(Earlier: 9:27 a.m.)  voted 5-4 today to uphold President Barack Obama’s Affordable Health Care Act.

Chief Justice John Roberts joined with the Court’s liberal wing of Associate Justices Elena Kagan, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor to uphold one of the President’s signature accomplishments.

This means all provisions of the law including the individual mandate requiring all Americans without health care to purchase it will take effect.

Patch will have an update later today with the reactions of and .

Richard Schulte June 29, 2012 at 04:43 pm
No, there won't be any doctors to treat you, so it won't really matter if you have insurance or not. . . . that's cool-we'll all be equal then.
Richard Schulte June 29, 2012 at 05:02 pm
Mr. Pritzker, could you please tell all of us what a "tea bagger" is? You need to have your mouth washed out with soap.
Sandra Sims June 29, 2012 at 05:17 pm
Another big drama queen, who probably holds forth for hours on end, with no one there but himself, just to hear the sound of his own voice and what he considers his pearls of wisdom. Then he comes on Patch and types it all out, hour after hour. The fact that rational people think he's a wingnut, just confirms his irrational wildly inflated opinion of himself. Also, he's a gasbag.
RB June 29, 2012 at 05:38 pm
Rich, the November election won't determine if it stands. Even if Willard wins, there is no chance of overturning. Fortunate.
Willard said the White House was not sleeping well. My guess is he's pulled the Ambian out. As Governor he implemented an almost identical healthcare plan and people like it. Doctors, hospitals, patients. Over 98% insured. The Heritage Society was for the individual mandate. A few sound bites at the right time and even Sheldon's Foreign Sands Casino money can't overcome the irony. Same old politics from the Republicans. Show trials, NRA score card and all.... Bunch of flatulent old men.
James Iverson June 29, 2012 at 05:41 pm
Dear Sandra, you expressed that very well!
RB June 29, 2012 at 05:49 pm
Rich, once again your mind is wandering. Like it did when you so boldly predicted the court would overturn. This was a clear win for Mr. Obama and The American People. As far as the new Tax,that's nothing other than Faux news talking points. If someone chooses not to buy insurance, they should pay a tax. Someday they will need healthcare and we should not have to pay for it as we do today. It's a major fix to a broken system, but you don't see that with the blinders on. Romney saw it, and the Heritage Foundation saw it too. They just changed their mind when Mr. Obama finally got it done, and it's constitutional!
Jim June 29, 2012 at 07:04 pm
RB,
The last laugh may be on you. http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/06/the_chief_justice_done_good.html
Rusty Shackleford June 29, 2012 at 07:29 pm
This was hardly a win for Obama.
Had they left it at not being a 'tax' it very certainly WOULD have been...except for the fact that we can repeal pretty much any law and that is exactly what will happen once the elections take place and we get these liberal nuts out of DC. Making it a tax puts one more nail in the administrations hopes for reelection. The PEOPLE were sold on this not being a tax and they were still pissed. Now that its been made obvious that our 'constitutional lawyer in chief' LIED yet again and this time even to his own constituency the PEOPLE are really going crazy about this joke of a law which is just another huge ass tax hike under the guise of heath care...
Rusty Shackleford June 29, 2012 at 07:31 pm
As long as the SCOTUS was working on this....and the fact that Roberts looks to have initially been against the 'mandate' it wouldnt suprise me to find out that the man did what he did intentionally to damage Obobo having any chance of reelection.
Rusty Shackleford June 29, 2012 at 07:41 pm
"Instead, even as he cast a powerful vote to rein in the Commerce Clause as our Founding Fathers intended for it to be applied against federal intrusiveness, Chief Justice Roberts returned Obamacare front-and-center back into the November elections debate. Defining it for what it really is -- a new, enormous federal tax on at least four million Americans"
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/06/the_chief_justice_done_good.html#ixzz1zDVBWWXh =============================================== absolutely agree. A lot of people, my wife and a list of others I know, had fallen asleep about all this OboboCare. After the SCOTUS ruling my wife started finally reading about the law, as did about half of those others, and all of them are PISSED now that they are beginning to understand what they should have known 18 months ago. My wife wasnt even going to bother to vote this year but thanks to Justice Roberts and keeping ObozoCare alive and exposing that it IS a tax (hello...tied into IRS....TAX....get it?) and she sees how it works more clearly she's voting like I am.....for ANYONE BUT Obama....
Me June 29, 2012 at 08:10 pm
I do love reading the Chicken Littlesque comments of the left and right wing trolls who such prolific writers. If they spent as much time working on solutions as they do on trying to insult everyone who doesn't think exactly as they do it would be a much better world.
Richard Schulte June 29, 2012 at 08:19 pm
"Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem." Ronald Reagan
Solutions? Conservatives already have the solutions-no need to work on the solutions a whole bunch. Common sense is the solution to most problems. Conservatism is 99.47 percent common sense.
Richard Schulte June 29, 2012 at 08:27 pm
RB, the basis for the Obamacare decision came out of left field somewheres. Hard to predict outliers.
Note that conservatives correctly predicted the results of Wisconsin recall election of Governor Walker. Perhaps our accuracy in predicting Supreme Court decision is not so great, but we call the important stuff, like elections, correctly. The 2012 election will follow the 2010 election model-landslide Republican victory. The TEA party produced the 2010 landslide and will produce the 2012 landslide. Stopping the implementation of Obamacare is relatively easy-President Romney will follow President Obama lead and just ignore the law. President Obama set the precedent of ignoring legally mandated laws and Romney will follow Obama's precedent. Be careful of what you wish for-you just might get it.
Richard Schulte June 29, 2012 at 08:43 pm
RB, what happens if you can't afford to pay the $95? If you can't afford the $95, you can't afford to buy health care insurance either.
President Fidel Obama, I mean President Barack Castro, has sunk the economy. I didn't move to Florida for the sunshine. I moved to Florida to find work. I know people who have been out of work for 2 years and longer. They can't afford to buy food-do you really think that, if you can't afford to buy food becaue Obamacare wrecked the American economy, they are going to pay the tax for not having health insurance? Obamacare destroyed the American economy. What good is health care insurance if you can't afford to buy food or afford the rent for shelter? Something tells me you've got a job-probably a government job-and you're asking yourself: recession, what recession? Yes, RB, 46 million Americans are receiving food stamps because they don't have enough money to buy food. In the America that I knew before President Fidel Obama assumed office, anybody who wanted a job could get a job and buying food and paying rent wasn't an issue. Since President Fidel Obama was elected in 2008, all of that has changed. Why? The answer to that question is that there is no difference between Castro, Chavez and Obama.
Richard Schulte June 29, 2012 at 08:45 pm
Last time I checked, Senator Kirk was an American citizen. To quote Hillary Clinton, "We are Americans and we have a right to debate." Since Senator Kirk is an American citizen, it would seem that he can express his opinion on Obamacare too, at least according to Hillary Clinton.
Richard Schulte June 29, 2012 at 09:03 pm
This is an excellent article on the American Thinker website. Chief Justice Roberts did an excellent job of framing the Obamacare issue for the 2012 election. To paraphrase James Carville, it's Obamacare, stupid.
The S.S. Obama just hit another iceberg and in 4 months will be joining the Titanic at the bottom of the ocean.
Richard Schulte June 29, 2012 at 09:09 pm
Another good article on the Supreme Court ruling:
Rasmussen: "Supreme Court Keeps Health Care Law on Life Support" "The U.S. Supreme Court's decision that President Obama's health care law is constitutional keeps it alive for now. But it's important to remember that the law has already lost in the court of public opinion. The Supreme Court ruling is a temporary reprieve more than anything else." http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2012/06/29/rasmussen-supreme-court-keeps-health-care-law-on-life-support/?subscriber=1 "It ain't over until the fat lady sings." The fat lady isn't scheduled to sing for another 4 months.
RB June 29, 2012 at 11:27 pm
Rich, as you quote dead Presidents I would like to give you a Romney quote from an op-Ed about RomneyCare that he wrote for USA today in 2009.
"First, we established incentives for those who were uninsured to buy insurance. Using tax penalties, as we did, or tax credits, as others have proposed, encourages "free riders" to take responsibility for themselves rather than pass their medical costs on to others"
Pat June 30, 2012 at 12:26 am
She is just a rubber stamp for the community organizer, that only voted 'present' on every vote when he was a Senator in IL. Cook County and the State of IL are forcing businesses and people out of our state due to politicians like the Pres, Jan Schackowsky, Madigan, Stroger, etc. We are killing the small businesses that made this country.
Scott Nelson June 30, 2012 at 01:13 am
No matter the outcome in November, the Neobags won't have a super majority in the Senate after the election. The new health care bill is here to stay. I love it! People just now are learning what is in the health care bill and are liking it. Could you imagine removing the donut hole coverage for seniors the largest voting bloc? Death for the slurping tea baggers. That is the prescription coverage the GOP put in place without a way to pay for it. The Dems added the donut hole coverage. I love The United States.
Scott Nelson June 30, 2012 at 01:14 am
One more thing, Rich here is always wrong. At least he is consistent.
Roxanne Conway July 2, 2012 at 03:54 pm
@Steve Handwerker
Here is a breakdown of what ObamaCare is: http://www.reddit.com/tb/vbkfm It's easy to read and straightforward. I hope this clears up any confusion.
Roxanne Conway July 2, 2012 at 03:55 pm
@Joe Nelson
Here is a breakdown of what ObamaCare is: http://www.reddit.com/tb/vbkfm It's easy to read and straightforward. I hope this clears up any confusion.
Roxanne Conway July 2, 2012 at 03:56 pm
Seems to be working out pretty well in Canada...
Here is a breakdown of what ObamaCare is: http://www.reddit.com/tb/vbkfm It's easy to read and straightforward. I hope this clears up any confusion.
Roxanne Conway July 2, 2012 at 03:57 pm
Here is a breakdown of what ObamaCare is:
http://www.reddit.com/tb/vbkfm It's easy to read and straightforward. I hope this clears up any confusion.
Roxanne Conway July 2, 2012 at 03:58 pm
@ John Utah
I think you might be missinformed about what ObamaCare really is. Here is a breakdown of what ObamaCare is: http://www.reddit.com/tb/vbkfm It's easy to read and straightforward. I hope this clears up any confusion.
Roxanne Conway July 2, 2012 at 03:59 pm
Here is a breakdown of what ObamaCare is:
http://www.reddit.com/tb/vbkfm It's easy to read and straightforward. I hope this clears up any confusion.
Roxanne Conway July 2, 2012 at 03:59 pm
Here is a breakdown of what ObamaCare is:
http://www.reddit.com/tb/vbkfm It's easy to read and straightforward. I hope this clears up any confusion.
Roxanne Conway July 2, 2012 at 04:00 pm
Here is a breakdown of what ObamaCare is:
http://www.reddit.com/tb/vbkfm It's easy to read and straightforward. I hope this clears up any confusion.
Par Golfer July 2, 2012 at 04:03 pm
what moron thinks the government can do anything well - let alone be involved in each and every individual's most personal decisions concerning their health? I am shocked that the ACLU isn't up in arms knowing the government which all ready knows your finances will now know your health status. Does anyone believe this won't be tampered with? Less doctors and more government workers - and you think things will get better and cheaper? I guess if you can't be seen by a doctor because they can't charge you if you haven't been there to see them - OH wait a minute - yes they can - they'll tax you anyway! You got to love demonratz

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Deerfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Steven June 11, 2013 at 01:19 pm
There is nothing historical about this house. The historical house was torn down in order to buildRead More a modern house which vaguely resembles the home that was owned by Lyman Wilmot. But calling this new construction "an important part of the history of Deerfield" is a travesty.
annette kalcheim June 14, 2013 at 07:39 am
Mara, So sorry you feel this way. We feel that this really improves the neighborhood. Tried toRead More keep much of old structure, but Igor's rehab and lack of upkeep, made it impossible. couldn't even keep floors, all warped from water and walls full of mold. City did nothing to stop Igor from combining two distinct properties. I am having a champagne lunch Wed. June 19, 11:30 to 1:30. Would love for you to come and see the house. Maybe that will change your mind. Annette Kalcheim
Mara Meyer June 15, 2013 at 09:33 pm
Annette - my first statement was "beautiful house" so I have no qualms with your outcome -Read More however, this is a re-do, re-creation not the original house. But good luck! I am sure you will find a buyer quickly!
J.Lyn June 9, 2013 at 06:10 am
I neglected to include contact information. Please contact Jennifer at : j.lyn.mclick@gmail.com