113 Board Puts $89 Million Referendum on Ballot

Deerfield and Highland Park voters will decide fate of District 113 Capital Improvement Plan April 9.

The District 113 School Board voted unanimously to adopt five years' worth of projects for Highland Park and Deerfield High Schools on Monday night, and voted to ask the communities for $89 million to help make them happen.

School officials praised the open and collaborative approach the district took to assembling the plan, which includes significant work on the two high school campuses. The plan marks the district's first step towards completing its master plan, which it signed off on in December of 2012.

"This is not the work of a small group of people," said Walter Hainsfurther, who presented phase one of the renovations during Monday night's board meeting and was a member of the Steering Committee. "It's the outcome of hundreds of volunteers over the last 18 months."

School board member Marjie Sandlow described an active school board that stayed relentlessly involved throughout the year and a half process of reaching out to and hearing suggestions from architecture firms, consulting firms and residents.

"We didn't just hire an architecture firm, have them do some work, wait for the results and then ask them questions at the end," said Sandlow, who believes she invested hundreds of hours into this process. "We were educated and up to date throughout the entire 18 months."

The renovation plan includes getting rid of building C on Highland Park's campus and replacing it with new classrooms. The physical education facilities in building C would be replaced with a a small, three court gymnasium on north end of campus, according to Hainsfurther. The district would maintain the option to expand the gymnasium into a field house, but it wouldn't be required by the plan.

"It could be five years, it could be never," Hainsfurther said about the potential field house.

The plan is projected to cost $114 million. Of that total, $25 million will come from the district's reserve funds and the remaining $89 million will come from District 113 residents. If the referendum passes, District 113 residents who own homes valued at $300,000 will pay $173 in taxes to the district in levy year 2013, a $47 increase from levy year 2012. If the referendum fails, those same homeowners would only pay $15 in taxes to District 113 in 2014 because the District paid off a significant amount of its debt this year. The 10-year average price residents have paid to District 113 in taxes is $198 annually, according to District 113's financial advisor, Tammie Schallmo, with PMA Securities.

The $25 million reduction will bring District 113's reserve funds below the recommended level of between 40 to 50 percent of the district's operating budget, according to board member Michael Smith. However, Smith assured attendees that the board would rebuild the reserve funds in the next five years.

"I am confident that our community will make wise choices," Smith said as he voiced his support for the referendum. 

Should the referendum pass, construction will begin in 2014, starting with the Highland Park multipurpose gym and the new pool on Deerfield's campus. Between 2015 and 2017, building C at Highland Park will be demolished and rebuilt, and work will begin on the new pool on Highland Park's campus. Highland Park's building B will be refurbished during this period, and Deerfield will get a new media center.

"Education plays a vital role in the lives of our children," board member Bonnie Schlensky said. "We are teaching our kids in buildings that were built 50 to 100 years ago."

Work will end in 2018, with the repurposing of Deerfield's current pool. The plan was designed by the architecture firm Perkins and Will. 

While members of the school board acknowledged that not everyone in the district would vote in favor of the referendum, they expressed optimism that even detractors would acknowledge that the district has made this project open to residents every step of the way.

"Hopefully we will agree we've been given so much information and information that we need to move forward," said board member Debra Hymen.

After the school board approved the referendum, residents spoke both in favor and against it.

"This is an excellent plan and you should all be proud of it," said Highland Park resident Dan Jenks. "The merits of this plan are strong enough to withstand any reasonable criticisms."

Sam Shapiro, who was one of the volunteers on a District 113 community group in 2012, was concerned that maintenance costs would increase dramatically as a result of a new HVAC system and other building improvements.

"There's been absolutely no analysis at this point of additional operating costs that will come with a significant expansion of facilities," Sam Shapiro, Highland Park resident, said. 

However, Shapiro did not explicitly say he opposed the plan. 

"The community will have a chance to weigh in and I look forward to participating in that process," he said.

For news about Deerfield and Highland Park in your mailbox every day, subscribe to the Patch newsletter. For more news and updates, like Highland Park and Deerfield Patch on Facebook.

Michelle Holleman January 15, 2013 at 01:28 PM
The choice is C.L.E.A.R. Community leaders have organized and filed as a Ballot Initiative Committee with the State of Illinois to support the upcoming referendum in District 113. Operating under the acronym C.L.E.A.R. 113, (Community Leaders Educating and Advocating for the Referendum in 113), the group is co-chaired by Dan Jenks representing Highland Park High School and Tony Horwitz representing Deerfield High School. We’re just getting started, but you can find more information about the upcoming referendum and about our group by joining our group on Facebook and following us on twitter at @clear113info. To get involved in sharing the message, send an e-mail to clear113info@yahoo.com.
RB January 15, 2013 at 03:39 PM
Can someone please explain to me as a Deerfield resident what percent of this tax increase revenue goes to Deerfield High School vs. Highland Park High School?
forest barbieri January 15, 2013 at 05:06 PM
This initiative offers a CLEAR path to the future. Do we want to invest into the basic fabric of our community going forward or do we choose to stand by while our High School infrastructure falls further behind? Staying out of a comparison between communities, the root issue is what we want to provide our children within their education process. Certainly curriculum, quality of teachers and infrastructure are key components. Curriculum is pretty much designated by state and federal requirements. Quality of teachers is something controlled by hiring practices, compensation, evaluation and the continual education of our educators. Certainly, there can and will always be some issues here. Without a doubt our teachers are generously paid to be at the top of the spectrum with several D113 salaries over 130K and one actually over 200K. That leaves the physical environment wherein a hurried and disorganized proposal last year failed. This year I believe a rational and reasonable proposal is being put forth and while it is unlikely to please all the people...what does please all the people in any facet of life?...it certainly has been well thought out and having two children within the educational process as well as owning several HP taxed properties, I want to go on record as completely in support of the referendum this time!
Walter White January 15, 2013 at 05:21 PM
More catchy acronyms. Greeeaaaaat. I suggest the anti-referendum folks adopt Schools Have Indecent Tariffs 113.
Pete Trotter January 15, 2013 at 05:55 PM
How soon does early voting open so I can vote NO!!!
Walter (Tripp) Hainsfurther January 15, 2013 at 07:47 PM
Pete: Out of curiosity, si there any bond issue you would support? Based on all your previous posts it seems the answer would be "no."
David Greenberg January 16, 2013 at 02:07 AM
The portions of the $89 million allocated to the various portions of the project are detailed here: http://dist113.org/Documents/THSD%20113%20Master%20Plan%20Budget%20rev%2016%20Bd%20Mtg%201%207%2013.pdf
David Greenberg January 16, 2013 at 02:17 AM
During the previous election cycle, an amount was proposed, some were in favor, some were not, and a call for a Better Plan was made. The previous referendum failed. We can debate all day long as to the reasons why, but ultimately work on a long-range Master Plan, a "better plan" was undertaken. For 18+ months, members of the community (myself included) have given of their time to delve into the question of Wants v. Needs, to crawl around the infrastructure, talk to the Students/Staff, debate, gnash teeth, and ultimately work to craft a better plan. Is it perfect? Nope, and I doubt that it ever will be. No plan ever is. But one thing is for certain, it is better. Rather than 'potchkeying' up facilities at DHS and HPHS in the future, we have a roadmap of how to proceed so we can be assured that we won't end up building something, only to tear it out in a few years to make room for something else (tennis courts seem to come to mind). We have a commitment from the Board and the Administration to set aside significant percentages of the budget for on-going maintenance. They're compiling and refining a maintenance plan/procedures now. They're implementing a maintenance ticket program which will track every ticket and it's progress (and I hope they simply post the tickets on their website for all to see)... They're listening to the Community...and more. All this is quite remarkable and appreciated. The amounts detailed need to be done and deserve our support.
Jack Straw January 16, 2013 at 04:30 AM
Seems like a lot of good people did a lot of hard work on this plan, I don’t know how I will vote but I sure appreciate the hard work everyone put in to this. Thanks all.
Todd Grayson January 16, 2013 at 06:49 PM
@RB - I truly hope that Deerfield residents don't think too much went to HP and HP residents think too much went to Deerfield. The plan was written based on needs, not looking for 50:50 or per student (HP is much larger) or per capita. It was written based on problems to be fixed. Deerfield HS does have problems, but it is a much "younger" building. Remember, HPHS was originally Deerfield Shields High School. I am sure some Deerfield residents are going to see stuff for HP they don't agree on and HP residents won't understand the DHS improvements. The planners tried to be responsible and fair. No plan is perfect. But borrowing money this year will be much cheaper than in the next election cycle.
A concerned DHS Parent January 16, 2013 at 07:54 PM
Old H.P. You summed it up perfectly.
RB January 16, 2013 at 08:29 PM
Thanks for project costs. It's really a $120M which had gotten past me, so I'm glad they are not asking us to pay all that.
Enrique H. March 02, 2013 at 05:31 PM
Not voting for it. Still costing the taxpayers $120 million dollars, any way you cut it. I suppose we should feel a little better that the District is dipping into $25 million dollars that we have already given them to help fund the bloated, senseless project? I don't feel any better about it. The largest chunk of this project is going to pools and gyms. I don't really care that a lot of "hard work and discussion" went in to this plan. I'm sure a lot of planning went into the Bay of Pigs Invasion and the Battle of Cannae, but that didn't make either plan successful (for the US/Cuban exiles or the Romans!). Unfortunately, for "The Master Plan," the focus was on the micro-aspects of the plan and the big picture was completely forgotten, which is common in any school district discussion. The only portion of the plan I would be willing to fund is replacing the HVAC system, and that should only be done through district cash reserves (i.e. money we have given them that they somehow managed to save).


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something