.
Feedback

District 109 Teachers Picket, Hope to Avoid Strike

Both sides hope federal mediator will help reach settlement.

Teachers in have been working on an expired contract since August and have been picketing outside the administration office each weekday afternoon since Friday letting people know they are not happy with their situation. 

Teachers of the Deerfield Education Association union have been negotiating with a team of administrators and School Board members through a federal mediator in hopes of reaching an agreement. 

Though both sides are hopeful mediation sessions Monday and Dec. 14 will bring the teachers and administration closer together if not to a settlement, union President has not ruled out a strike. Jensen teaches social studies at Caruso Middle School. 

“We took a vote to see if our members would support informational picketing and a possible strike,” Jensen said. “They supported both overwhelmingly,” he added while stressing they were nowhere near taking a strike vote or authorizing one. 

School Board President has lived in Deerfield 17 years and been a member of the board for the last 11. In her memory there has never been a strike. Negotiations have required the assistance of a mediator for two of the three contracts arranged during her tenure. She too is hopeful. 

“Can we settle this in as short a time as possible,” London said? “I would hope so. While the teachers charted a list of grievances, London would not comment. “I’m not going to get into any issue,” she said. “I’m not going to negotiate in public.” 

While both sides agree compensation should be fair, the teachers are also concerned about working conditions, classroom environments and health insurance benefits. A 30 percent reduction of students classified as needing special education is a particular worry. 

“They didn’t go away,” Kipling fourth grade teacher Amy Karasick said referring to children who previously received special attention. “They’re in the regular classrooms. This affects everyone in the classroom.” 

Jenson is also upset with an effort to increase health insurance costs for teachers that were covered in the past. “They want to double, triple and quadruple the cost of co-pays,” he said. 

While teachers contend district business manager Greg Himebaugh has said District 109 has been in solid financial shape for the last seven years, they do not understand why the administration is not more generous with its offers. 

London will not comment on any specific issues. She said she must balance the concerns of Deerfield’s citizens with the teachers’ needs. “We have to be fiscally responsible to the taxpayers and at the same be fair with faculty and staff,” she said.

Linda November 12, 2011 at 01:43 pm
Please know that teachers are well aware of the state of the economy and the stress on families. We see the effects of that stress in the children we work with as well as in our own families. I frequently hear people compare our schools to the corporate world. Although finances are, of course, an issue in both, it is essential to keep in mind that our "product" is children not a commodity or money itself. When we do our jobs well, we don't bring more money into the district but your children's lives are enriched (academically, social-emotionally, and in terms of enhancing character development). I also am concerned about the argument that "everyone else is suffering also". When we as a society wish for everyone to get the LEAST of what other's get, workers rights, working conditions, and compensation will continue to decrease.
MDG November 12, 2011 at 04:32 pm
First I want to thank many of the teachers for their wonderful work and committment. I agree that 21st Century Skills should be reevaluated, I question the value. I also believe the residents should be more aware of the specific increases in healthcare costs that are being recommended. From a personal perspective, my premiums increased 20%, and my out of pocket deductible for my family increased 50% this year; teachers should expect similar increases in their out of pocket costs, even if it amounts to a pay decrease. Overall the amount of information flowing to the residents is limited, and puts all at a disadvantage.
RB November 12, 2011 at 05:28 pm
I agree. I support our teachers, however if they expect us to support them in a contract negotiation...it would be helpful to know what they are negotiating.
Mara Meyer November 12, 2011 at 09:28 pm
Yes Chris, language just as you have suggested is very telling to the disgard of the staff from the administration (and the Board). There is no reason the Board and Admin should have let this negotiation go into November. I question the Admin henchman who has a reputation of disrespect for Staff in previous employment positions.
Robby November 13, 2011 at 04:16 pm
Well Said!
Robby November 13, 2011 at 04:19 pm
Or smarter parents?
Life is Good November 13, 2011 at 08:18 pm
Yes Alice, I am really that selfish. I pay for my health care and I don't really want to pay for teachers health care.
DeerfieldResident November 13, 2011 at 11:19 pm
Call me selfish if you'd like, but I'm being realistic. Healthcare costs for everyone has gone up. It's a reality. If you have a magic wand that can bring healthcare costs down for everyone, then wave it. But I don't believe that exists and these higher costs are our new reality. Sorry, but that's life. We pay hefty monthly healthcare premiums and even heftier property taxes. So, I don't think I'm being selfish. I'm being realistic.
DeerfieldResident November 13, 2011 at 11:21 pm
While our teachers do a great job, so much of the performance level of our students has to do with involved, educated parents. I don't think if we sent this group of teachers and financial resources into an inner city school where parental involvement were minimal, we'd see the same exceptional test scores.
AliceCameron November 14, 2011 at 01:40 am
Life is Good- Could you explain to me exactly how much you are paying for Deerfield School District 109 teachers health care? They don't want cheaper health care, they just don't want it raised. Wouldn't you want that too?
DeerfieldResident- I completely understand and agree with you, but at the same time this is something Deerfield Resident's can do something when it comes to our teachers. I'm not saying they should be lowered, but it's hard enough without health care costs being raised. I know you said in your last post that you no longer want to support the teachers because of the position we are all in due to the economy, but I don't think giving up will make anything better. When people are in a position to help others get what anyone would deserve and want I would hope everyone would support that.
Mara Meyer November 14, 2011 at 04:17 am
I suggest discussion of costs are merited rather than saying take it or leave it. Do you really think it is easy to find such quality and dedication off the street.?
Mara Meyer November 14, 2011 at 04:19 am
And to those who wish the public knew more-that is exactly how the Board and Admin want it.
Life is Good November 15, 2011 at 05:12 pm
Alice, I don't want my healthcare premiums raised, or my taxes or my utility bills or anything else for that matter. But guess what?? It happens to EVERYONE
Harry Steindler November 16, 2011 at 03:17 am
To the school board and representatives of the teachers' union -
Deerfield parents are amongst the most concerned and involved of any most of us have ever seen. They care incredibly about the care and education of our children and are generally willing to volunteer and share in the process in any way needed. I believe it is right and should be expected that the board and teachers share their points of concern and contention with the community. The board is elected to represent the residents of the district - we need to know if you are representing us properly. What changes are you proposing or opposed to? The public's views on what the teachers are looking for in negotiations are all across the board – teachers, it would be helpful if we could hear what you need to happen in order to feel you are being treated fairly and just as importantly what needs to happen as a result of these negotiations to make sure our children – all of our children – are receiving the education and services District 109 children deserve. My three children are well gone from District 109; the youngest is a junior at DHS. My two oldest, who both have special needs are experiencing successful young adult lives thanks in great part to the excellent services they received while at South Park and Caruso. I trust those services are still as excellent or are perhaps even better now – I would like to hear what the board and teachers have to say.
Harry Steindler November 16, 2011 at 04:09 am
Mara - can you tell me specifically what has changed in the special education services? When the district was in the process of evaluating their educational approach a year or two ago and seemed to be putting a much greater emphasis on education of gifted students I wrote to the board and superintendant asking that there be no diminution of the quality of services received by children with special needs. I received no response and unfortunately did not follow up. From what I've heard from others it seems that children with special needs have lost out but I don't know the specifics.
Mara Meyer November 16, 2011 at 04:31 am
Harry, what has transpired is the notion of Response to Intervention (RtI), inclusion and the lack of support in the regular classroom for the students with disabilities. There has been a reduction in the total percentage of SPED students, probably due to attrition, and a reduction in staff without the thought to gen ed needs for these students. In addition, the Admin has asked for input and trained teachers for the "21st Century" skills program and give no supports for implementation. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Another example is requiring all students, irrespective of possible learning issues, to enroll in foreign language. This is great, however, implementation has been problematic without instructional support.
It seems some of these changes are truly implemented without fully thinking the impact to the school community. The instsructional stress, on top of the economic issues, is leaving all with bad feelings. I just looked at the Budget in the tax levy discussion in the Board packet for last Monday and there seems to be plenty of dollars. I just don't think there is much good faith bargaining occurring between the parties.
john November 17, 2011 at 03:56 pm
I am tired that teachers think that job security and benefits are and entitlement. I am sure they have read that health care costs have gone up dramatically over the years. The majority of our workers in this country have to pay more every year.
Where does it say that teachers are exempt from that expense? There is just so much money coming in for the budget. Its not infinite. The board should tell the union that this is how much is in the drawer for salaries and benefits. You want more money to come out to cover the rise of health insurance, then there is no money for the salary increase next year. Simple. Times are tough. Get real. And dont use the emotional plea, "we are in this just for the kids". Partially yes, But is it really about your pockebook.
kurt swanson November 17, 2011 at 05:24 pm
teachers are great. but parent there should be more learning going on in your own home. and teachers times are changing, i feel for you and everyone else. let hope this economy get better in 2013. wink wink
Marge November 29, 2011 at 06:15 pm
I agree with you AliceCameron! What is wrong with this Board?! They say they want
'what is best for children', yet their actions don't back up their words! If they really want what is best for kids why would they propose to increase class size, keep kids outside in weather below 15 degrees, cut SPED by 30%, and get rid of resource in the middle schools?! I wish the Board did care about all students (not just the gifted) and had some integrity.
A December 5, 2011 at 02:20 am
Shouldn't we also be asking why 4 new administrative staff members have been hired in the last 5 years on top of what they already had previously? Why admin has continued to get 8-10% raises each year over the last 5 years (public information, just have to do the computation)? It makes me really wonder why they do not want to give the teachers even 3%? Aren't the teachers the most important ones educating our students in our wonderful schools?
A December 5, 2011 at 02:34 am
You can see teacher and administrators salaries online as well as the district report card from the state. Very interesting to see how they stack up against other districts.
Here is one of the docs: http://www.isbe.state.il.us/research/pdfs/teacher_salary_10-11.pdf
HB December 5, 2011 at 11:05 pm
It seems that many of these posts are from people who no longer have children in District 109. I am here to say that things have changed. I have a child with and IEP and I am disgusted with the way students with IEP's are treated. Ask any parent of special needs student in DPS109 and they will tell you that it's a daily FIGHT with teachers and administration to follow accomodations that are supposed to be LAW! Maybe the reason for the high legal fees are that parents seek legal assistance to have special services enforced.
This is an affluent area that expects a lot from it's students. As parents, we have to hire private tutors to teach our children what should be taught at school.(especially for a kid requiring special services) And I will bet that many "gifted" students are also being tutored to supplement their studies. This district is focused on raising test scores, period. Look at all past school board meeting minutes. Writing the BOE is useless as they are locked in with teacher/admininstrator friends and will support each other no matter what. Time to clean house! I support DPS109 STUDENTS!
Mara Meyer December 5, 2011 at 11:28 pm
HB - You have it wrong! Things have not changed, they have only gotten worse. Previously there was a Special Education trained person in charge of Special Education and you still had to fight "village hall" to get what your child needed. However at that time personal conversations and other administrators who were fully aware of the needs of Special Education proved positive. When that person retired they demoted the position and put a non-special education person as the overseer of the programs. Just recently the District hired a wonderfully competent Special Education "Director" who I am sure is trying hardest to protect the students. However with an attitude of how the Board and Administrators are behaving, good luck! If people don't get it they don't get it! There are simple solutions to put in place and many of the staff are extremely competent to implement the needed changes. This District refuses to budge! They just bide the time waiting for the students to leave the District! Headaches all around!
Harry Steindler December 5, 2011 at 11:30 pm
HB - you've probably seen my posts - I am a parent of students with special needs who are already through DHS - I am trying to understand the issues involved. I would like to do all I can to make sure families and students are receiving the best services possible. Please feel free to contact me at hsteindler@slsf.com if you would like to talk further. By the way - that invitation is available to anyone with information or concerns that could help me understand what the issues are and what we can do to make sure our community is taking care of the children who need it most.
PrivateSector January 10, 2012 at 04:26 am
Unfortunately, many of those in public unions live in a bubble...they are used to having it so good for so long that they have no idea what is going on around them in the private sector. The teacher's union can whine all they want, the bottom line is that the money (salary, benefits, PENSION) is not there and things are getting worse. They can say the board is incompetent, yada, yada, but all of the financial issues will be self-correcting because, plain and simple, the tax revenue is not there and people in the private sector have spent that last decade getting whacked to death. It is astounding...let's see, how many District 109 teachers in the last 10 years have willing left their positions for a lateral move in another school district, a private school, or a private-sector job??? How about ZERO. Why? Because this is one of the most highly compensated middle-school districts around. The State of IL, in round numbers, has over $100 BILLION in unfunded pension obligations has a result of many decades of sweetheart deals with the public unions, including the powerful state teachers unions.
So, since they 109 teachers union is so concerned about IEP, why don't they belly up and make some real sacrifices to help eliminate the so-called "gutting" of IEP? They are just using the parents. I also must note that it is shameful to use children at these board meetings. Talk about human shields!
PrivateSector January 10, 2012 at 04:28 am
Nice job A. Sheds a lot of light for sure. Wow, our teachers are really getting screwed! I wonder why they never leave (willingly)...???
PrivateSector January 10, 2012 at 04:36 am
Oh, and Jenson is not ruling out a possible strike....Go ahead, strike...see how that works out for you.
Mara Meyer January 10, 2012 at 01:29 pm
I believe the community is somewhat fed up with how the disparity between Administrative compensation and the certified staff compensation has evolved. this is the proverbial straw. The instructional issues, including special education process and policy, have been issues for too long - not just recently. Historically poor decision making on the Adminstration and board's part is what is driving the consternation instrucitonally. All too often the immediate actions override what the history is driving.
Mara Meyer January 10, 2012 at 01:30 pm
Would you prefer malicious compliance? That only leads to bad feelings. If the district goes out - no one wins!
Hilmer March 22, 2012 at 02:19 pm
"In the first place God made idiots. This was for practice. Then He made school boards."
Mark Twain - Following the Equator, Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Deerfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
RB June 19, 2013 at 09:16 pm
This is just about the part where you NRA folks start spewing the "can't infringe upon theRead More right to bear arms" lingo in the 2nd. Well, guess what? Constitutionally we as citizens can! It's been done before and will again. The Supreme Court has never said you folks can carry an RPG, so I guess they "infringed" huh? Mindless farmers with the God and Guns signs along the highway here next? Keep your pistols and hunting rifles...it's assault weapons that we're discussing keeping out of this Village and we can infringe upon them all we want....Constitutionally!
Dan Cox June 19, 2013 at 09:27 pm
RB, You do not understand Heller or McDonald or the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court never saidRead More we can't carry an RPG either! Wilson has been going on for over 6 years, but it will strike down Cook Counties infringement and we will once again...collect Millions in Legal fees.
RB June 19, 2013 at 09:54 pm
RPG was used as an example of limitations. To quote from the majority opinion inRead More Heller...."Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose"
Steven June 11, 2013 at 01:19 pm
There is nothing historical about this house. The historical house was torn down in order to buildRead More a modern house which vaguely resembles the home that was owned by Lyman Wilmot. But calling this new construction "an important part of the history of Deerfield" is a travesty.
annette kalcheim June 14, 2013 at 07:39 am
Mara, So sorry you feel this way. We feel that this really improves the neighborhood. Tried toRead More keep much of old structure, but Igor's rehab and lack of upkeep, made it impossible. couldn't even keep floors, all warped from water and walls full of mold. City did nothing to stop Igor from combining two distinct properties. I am having a champagne lunch Wed. June 19, 11:30 to 1:30. Would love for you to come and see the house. Maybe that will change your mind. Annette Kalcheim
Mara Meyer June 15, 2013 at 09:33 pm
Annette - my first statement was "beautiful house" so I have no qualms with your outcome -Read More however, this is a re-do, re-creation not the original house. But good luck! I am sure you will find a buyer quickly!
J.Lyn June 9, 2013 at 06:10 am
I neglected to include contact information. Please contact Jennifer at : j.lyn.mclick@gmail.com